|
Post by badhabitude on Dec 31, 2023 3:03:02 GMT
How long will it take for them to fix this faceoff stupidity? This business of throwing guys out from the faceoff is just totally stupid. They do it for fuck knows why 90% of the time.
Fix this shit.
No one wants to see all this shit show square dance at the dot practically every fucking time.
Just fix this shit. End. Done.
In any way of a billion ways. Make them line up with their sticks on their knees. or Penalties for not lining up right. or Paint lines that your stick must be on and your feet must be behind the line or penalty. or make them line up further back by putting the lines further back or total redesign it and place the puck on the dot and blow the whistle to start or any of 999 million ways I haven't thought of. But this bullshit of throwing guys out just slows down the game and gives on team possibly an advantage.
Can anyone think of any rule in any sport where there isn't a penalty but just gets a scolding from the ref?
Closest thing I can think of is encroaching of free kicks in soccer, but they fixed that shit simply with a can of spray foam. why? how? - because someone thought it about it longer than fat fucking half drunk fan on a Saturday night.
Fucking stupid NHL
|
|
|
Post by sandogbrewin on Dec 31, 2023 15:18:23 GMT
Linesman are on a power trip.
|
|
|
Post by islamorada on Dec 31, 2023 16:22:11 GMT
How long will it take for them to fix this faceoff stupidity? This business of throwing guys out from the faceoff is just totally stupid. They do it for fuck knows why 90% of the time. Fix this shit. No one wants to see all this shit show square dance at the dot practically every fucking time. Just fix this shit. End. Done. In any way of a billion ways. Make them line up with their sticks on their knees. or Penalties for not lining up right. or Paint lines that your stick must be on and your feet must be behind the line or penalty. or make them line up further back by putting the lines further back or total redesign it and place the puck on the dot and blow the whistle to start or any of 999 million ways I haven't thought of. But this bullshit of throwing guys out just slows down the game and gives on team possibly an advantage. Can anyone think of any rule in any sport where there isn't a penalty but just gets a scolding from the ref? Closest thing I can think of is encroaching of free kicks in soccer, but they fixed that shit simply with a can of spray foam. why? how? - because someone thought it about it longer than fat fucking half drunk fan on a Saturday night. Fucking stupid NHL McLeod would not put his stick on the ice in last night's game. Ah, make it a delay of game. As for players moving into the FO, well, don't waste more time by kicking out the center. Call a penalty. Right now in important face-offs, two centers are placed on the ice. Yup, "you are a bad boy" is not good enough.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Dec 31, 2023 17:26:50 GMT
Old timers - remember when tying the puck up against the boards was a thing? In my high school days my whole job was to get an offensive zone face off by banging into guys and tying up the puck. In was delay of game then as it always was but they never called it. And it took them DECADES to fix it. These are stupid fucks.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Dec 31, 2023 17:30:20 GMT
How long will it take for them to fix this faceoff stupidity? This business of throwing guys out from the faceoff is just totally stupid. They do it for fuck knows why 90% of the time. Fix this shit. No one wants to see all this shit show square dance at the dot practically every fucking time. Just fix this shit. End. Done. In any way of a billion ways. Make them line up with their sticks on their knees. or Penalties for not lining up right. or Paint lines that your stick must be on and your feet must be behind the line or penalty. or make them line up further back by putting the lines further back or total redesign it and place the puck on the dot and blow the whistle to start or any of 999 million ways I haven't thought of. But this bullshit of throwing guys out just slows down the game and gives on team possibly an advantage. Can anyone think of any rule in any sport where there isn't a penalty but just gets a scolding from the ref? Closest thing I can think of is encroaching of free kicks in soccer, but they fixed that shit simply with a can of spray foam. why? how? - because someone thought it about it longer than fat fucking half drunk fan on a Saturday night. Fucking stupid NHL McLeod would not put his stick on the ice in last night's game. Ah, make it a delay of game. As for players moving into the FO, well, don't waste more time by kicking out the center. Call a penalty. Right now in important face-offs, two centers are placed on the ice. Yup, "you are a bad boy" is not good enough. It is SO fixable but these dumb bastards don't see it.
|
|
|
Post by dannycater on Jan 2, 2024 23:41:58 GMT
Old timers - remember when tying the puck up against the boards was a thing? In my high school days my whole job was to get an offensive zone face off by banging into guys and tying up the puck. In was delay of game then as it always was but they never called it. And it took them DECADES to fix it. These are stupid fucks. I would love to see the return of the....tie game after 60 minutes....both teams earn a point, no loser points, winner points, 3x3 OT (once 4x4), shootouts...all gimmicks...Gimmicks should not decide NHL playoff positions...and they have...that to me is bullshit...I don't know how many times I've seen the B's rally over the years to earn "a tie" only to lose in OT, then hear players say sadly "it's disappointing. We lost." BULLSHIT...you came back and you earned a tie, end of story...easier to explain standings and it was the right thing to do in an 82-game NHL schedule that really can't have conventional overtime...you know the real type..the one they play in the PLAYOFFS to decide series.
|
|
|
Post by dannycater on Jan 2, 2024 23:44:48 GMT
Also figure out the offsides replay rule...and goalie interference....Jesus, they make it so hard. Need statute of limitions on replay...linesmen don't catch the offside, then guess what...IT'S NOT OFFSIDE...YOU CAN'T CHALLENGE...A GOAL SCORED, SO WHAT!...as for goalie interference, can we stop giving goalies dresses and say they can't be touched...at least make it a player actually affects the goalie by chopping at him or bumping into him, or knocking him over....this we're not sure bullshit has to end...replays take too long....time for the refs to actually earn their money...make a call, or don't make a call...enough.
|
|
|
Post by MrHulot on Jan 5, 2024 1:16:47 GMT
Old timers - remember when tying the puck up against the boards was a thing? In my high school days my whole job was to get an offensive zone face off by banging into guys and tying up the puck. In was delay of game then as it always was but they never called it. And it took them DECADES to fix it. These are stupid fucks. I would love to see the return of the....tie game after 60 minutes....both teams earn a point, no loser points, winner points, 3x3 OT (once 4x4), shootouts...all gimmicks...Gimmicks should not decide NHL playoff positions...and they have...that to me is bullshit...I don't know how many times I've seen the B's rally over the years to earn "a tie" only to lose in OT, then hear players say sadly "it's disappointing. We lost." BULLSHIT...you came back and you earned a tie, end of story...easier to explain standings and it was the right thing to do in an 82-game NHL schedule that really can't have conventional overtime...you know the real type..the one they play in the PLAYOFFS to decide series. Hard no on that one. Ties suck. But they should go to three points for a normal win, two points for a win in OT or SO, and one point for a loss in OT or SO.
|
|
|
Post by schlich on Jan 5, 2024 2:55:28 GMT
Also figure out the offsides replay rule...and goalie interference....Jesus, they make it so hard. Need statute of limitions on replay...linesmen don't catch the offside, then guess what...IT'S NOT OFFSIDE...YOU CAN'T CHALLENGE...A GOAL SCORED, SO WHAT!...as for goalie interference, can we stop giving goalies dresses and say they can't be touched...at least make it a player actually affects the goalie by chopping at him or bumping into him, or knocking him over....this we're not sure bullshit has to end...replays take too long....time for the refs to actually earn their money...make a call, or don't make a call...enough. scope creep
|
|
|
Post by islamorada on Jan 5, 2024 13:14:27 GMT
Also figure out the offsides replay rule...and goalie interference....Jesus, they make it so hard. Need statute of limitions on replay...linesmen don't catch the offside, then guess what...IT'S NOT OFFSIDE...YOU CAN'T CHALLENGE...A GOAL SCORED, SO WHAT!...as for goalie interference, can we stop giving goalies dresses and say they can't be touched...at least make it a player actually affects the goalie by chopping at him or bumping into him, or knocking him over....this we're not sure bullshit has to end...replays take too long....time for the refs to actually earn their money...make a call, or don't make a call...enough. Yup, when refs make a call on ice so they can review is the most damning. You are not that good to know what happen on ice then just maybe you should get another set of refs.
|
|
|
Post by islamorada on Jan 5, 2024 13:16:19 GMT
Another pet peeve is delay of game when a defenseman shoots the puck out of play. Well, simply make it for all zones for any player. Increased scoring would result, Gary.
The point system has been bantered around quite a bit on the forum. If you lose a game, you don't get anything. Why? Well the end of regulation would not be lets get a point but rather we don't want to play into OT. Gwary likes loser points.... but it is boring. Two for a W.
|
|
|
Post by dannycater on Jan 5, 2024 15:39:11 GMT
Another pet peeve is delay of game when a defenseman shoots the puck out of play. Well, simply make it for all zones for any player. Increased scoring would result, Gary. The point system has been bantered around quite a bit on the forum. If you lose a game, you don't get anything. Why? Well the end of regulation would not be lets get a point but rather we don't want to play into OT. Gwary likes loser points.... but it is boring. Two for a W. Last minute of regulation ties are sometimes running out clock to OT...other ways to look at it rather than oh it's a tie...to me, I was a freak as a kid. I liked ties if the game resembled 60 minutes of 2 teams who did a lot of things well, matched well, and "deserved" to end in a tie, or rewarding a team down 3-0, gets a 4-4 tie and as the team that rallied back...you felt like it was a win. It's not simple cut and dry on "boring." I've seen many a boring 3-on-3 OT as teams are now coming and out of zones, trying to not get "burned."
|
|
|
Post by davinator on Jan 5, 2024 16:44:13 GMT
Another pet peeve is delay of game when a defenseman shoots the puck out of play. Well, simply make it for all zones for any player. Increased scoring would result, Gary. The point system has been bantered around quite a bit on the forum. If you lose a game, you don't get anything. Why? Well the end of regulation would not be lets get a point but rather we don't want to play into OT. Gwary likes loser points.... but it is boring. Two for a W. Last minute of regulation ties are sometimes running out clock to OT...other ways to look at it rather than oh it's a tie...to me, I was a freak as a kid. I liked ties if the game resembled 60 minutes of 2 teams who did a lot of things well, matched well, and "deserved" to end in a tie, or rewarding a team down 3-0, gets a 4-4 tie and as the team that rallied back...you felt like it was a win. It's not simple cut and dry on "boring." I've seen many a boring 3-on-3 OT as teams are now coming and out of zones, trying to not get "burned." I wished we'd had a tie last night at the end of regulation...
|
|