|
Post by kelvana33 on Oct 21, 2016 18:51:15 GMT
I messed up the quote box BHab, but the post above is in reference to you saying the FBI didn't find enough evidence. Crooked Hilary. Call me what you will, but here is my conclusion after looking at that and several other sources. Does it look bad? Yes. Was enough evidence found that could bring charges? No. How many FBI and police such as yourself are "liberals"? Honestly, off the top of my head of the people I know - one guy who did tax stuff for the FBI, he's insanely right wing, the 2 cops I know - very conservative. The one cop I know on this website (goes by the name of Kel something or other), also right wing as far as I can tell. I find it very hard to believe that they wouldn't have Hillary's head on a pole IF they could nail her for something. Further - and I'll say this for both candidates, Hillary is a lawyer and Trump surrounds himself with lawyers. Did BOTH do things that people would question, yes. Just to pick on Trump, refusing to rent to blacks, Trump university, the Polish workers - he made sure he wouldn't get nailed. I would guess his lawyers had a worse case scenario, yah, you might get a fine, but certainly you won't see jail time. And same for Hillary. Neither one of them are stupid enough to rob convenience stores that have security cameras. So for both - close to illegal or just over the line, yes, but enough to get any prison time, no. At the end of the day it's politics. Trump has done a much better job of playing up Hillary's wrong doings, and Trump has remained pretty teflon as far as popular opinion. And here is a bonehead thing from the left, NOT paying taxes for example - clearly NOT illegal, he used tax laws to his advantage, nothing there. Yet the non payment of taxes is what gets the most attention and its a nothing. Just like Trump with the groping. It's not rape, it's just unwanted kissing or touching. It was a way for him to get a quickie. Notice he wasn't stupid enough to outright rape some woman - not one woman who has stepped forward has said that. For the *most* part people like that don't commit crimes simply because they don't have to, they can obtain whatever they want by "legal" means albeit very close to breaking the law. Unless they are totally fucked in the head - like Bill Cosby for example, but those people *usually* get caught because they can't help themselves. Oh sure, I would *love* it if pictures turned up of Trump in compromising positions with under age farm animals just as much as you would like to see wikileaks produce the email from Putin to Hillary saying thanks for giving us the passwords to all the CIA files, the check for 3 billion dollars is in the mail. But it ain't going to happen. Neither candidate will be found committing a felony outright as much as we'd like to think so. Don't consider myself Republican or Democrat. I look at the issues and tend to make up my own mind. I agree with more stuff that Trump says than Hillary. There isn't much political about Trump, and I like that. Hillary is a polished politician, she's dome some real good stuff in her time, but for the issues that matter most to me I'm going with Trump. I'd like to see what someone like him will do for the country, I think he can get it back on track.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Oct 21, 2016 18:59:22 GMT
Don't consider myself Republican or Democrat. I look at the issues and tend to make up my own mind. I agree with more stuff that Trump says than Hillary. There isn't much political about Trump, and I like that. Hillary is a polished politician, she's dome some real good stuff in her time, but for the issues that matter most to me I'm going with Trump. I'd like to see what someone like him will do for the country, I think he can get it back on track. Of course Trump is political - and playing politics. He chooses what comes out of his mouth just the same as you or I. And just like every one of us he uses a political tactic that gets him what he wants. You want sex and the wife doesn't? You use politics just like me and Trump and everyone else.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2016 19:47:17 GMT
Bhab is an obnoxious liberal.
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Oct 21, 2016 20:29:12 GMT
Call me what you will, but here is my conclusion after looking at that and several other sources. Does it look bad? Yes. Was enough evidence found that could bring charges? No. How many FBI and police such as yourself are "liberals"? Honestly, off the top of my head of the people I know - one guy who did tax stuff for the FBI, he's insanely right wing, the 2 cops I know - very conservative. The one cop I know on this website (goes by the name of Kel something or other), also right wing as far as I can tell. I find it very hard to believe that they wouldn't have Hillary's head on a pole IF they could nail her for something. Further - and I'll say this for both candidates, Hillary is a lawyer and Trump surrounds himself with lawyers. Did BOTH do things that people would question, yes. Just to pick on Trump, refusing to rent to blacks, Trump university, the Polish workers - he made sure he wouldn't get nailed. I would guess his lawyers had a worse case scenario, yah, you might get a fine, but certainly you won't see jail time. And same for Hillary. Neither one of them are stupid enough to rob convenience stores that have security cameras. So for both - close to illegal or just over the line, yes, but enough to get any prison time, no. At the end of the day it's politics. Trump has done a much better job of playing up Hillary's wrong doings, and Trump has remained pretty teflon as far as popular opinion. And here is a bonehead thing from the left, NOT paying taxes for example - clearly NOT illegal, he used tax laws to his advantage, nothing there. Yet the non payment of taxes is what gets the most attention and its a nothing. Just like Trump with the groping. It's not rape, it's just unwanted kissing or touching. It was a way for him to get a quickie. Notice he wasn't stupid enough to outright rape some woman - not one woman who has stepped forward has said that. For the *most* part people like that don't commit crimes simply because they don't have to, they can obtain whatever they want by "legal" means albeit very close to breaking the law. Unless they are totally fucked in the head - like Bill Cosby for example, but those people *usually* get caught because they can't help themselves. Oh sure, I would *love* it if pictures turned up of Trump in compromising positions with under age farm animals just as much as you would like to see wikileaks produce the email from Putin to Hillary saying thanks for giving us the passwords to all the CIA files, the check for 3 billion dollars is in the mail. But it ain't going to happen. Neither candidate will be found committing a felony outright as much as we'd like to think so. Don't consider myself Republican or Democrat. I look at the issues and tend to make up my own mind. I agree with more stuff that Trump says than Hillary. There isn't much political about Trump, and I like that. Hillary is a polished politician, she's dome some real good stuff in her time, but for the issues that matter most to me I'm going with Trump. I'd like to see what someone like him will do for the country, I think he can get it back on track. I literally have no idea what makes you think he would do anything good for your country. I haven't heard a single credible, implementable policy position, and the overall assumption that being good a business means you'll be good as a President is laughably untrue. Now, I'm not doing any serious work to understand his policy positions, so I'm not saying this to suggest you're an idiot (you may be, but I don't have enough evidence). But I honestly cannot remember a time when a candidate got this far in any election and the only think I knew about his policy proposals was a ridiculous wall building idea.
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Oct 21, 2016 20:29:46 GMT
Bhab is an obnoxious liberal. I object to this. He is both of these things, but they are mutually exclusive.
|
|
|
Post by schlich on Oct 21, 2016 21:41:07 GMT
Bhab is an obnoxious liberal. I object to this. He is both of these things, but they are mutually exclusive. I though it was redundant.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2016 23:14:01 GMT
Bhab is an obnoxious liberal. I object to this. He is both of these things, but they are mutually exclusive. A steady drip of statism.
|
|
|
Post by kelvana33 on Oct 22, 2016 0:24:24 GMT
Don't consider myself Republican or Democrat. I look at the issues and tend to make up my own mind. I agree with more stuff that Trump says than Hillary. There isn't much political about Trump, and I like that. Hillary is a polished politician, she's dome some real good stuff in her time, but for the issues that matter most to me I'm going with Trump. I'd like to see what someone like him will do for the country, I think he can get it back on track. I literally have no idea what makes you think he would do anything good for your country. I haven't heard a single credible, implementable policy position, and the overall assumption that being good a business means you'll be good as a President is laughably untrue. Now, I'm not doing any serious work to understand his policy positions, so I'm not saying this to suggest you're an idiot (you may be, but I don't have enough evidence). But I honestly cannot remember a time when a candidate got this far in any election and the only think I knew about his policy proposals was a ridiculous wall building idea. What would Hillary do that would be good for the country? His has more policies than just a wall protecting the boarders ( I love this idea)...I have a friend who became a border patrol agent in Texas, very frustrating, brushing water against the tide he says. The amounts of heroin, guns, machetes, cocaine and other drugs they seize pales in comparison to what gets in. They have two agents covering hundreds of miles when other countries have over 50 for the same area span. 9 overdoses in my town alone this week (4 in a 48 hour span) and it just keeps getting worse. You administer 2 people doses of Narcan in a hotel room while the other guy in the room (who doesn't belong in the country, never mind the room) is locked in the bathroom and has bullet with your name on it because he has other plans than being taken for the 2 warrants he has on him, then perhaps you'll have enough evidence to suggest I'm an idiot.
I'm in there saving a life while the "bad hombre" 6 feet away behind the door is figuring out how he's going to end mine.
Fuck him. Vote Trump.
|
|
|
Post by NAS on Oct 22, 2016 0:54:13 GMT
Vote for tacos.
Then all sides win.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2016 1:30:40 GMT
Don't consider myself Republican or Democrat. I look at the issues and tend to make up my own mind. I agree with more stuff that Trump says than Hillary. There isn't much political about Trump, and I like that. Hillary is a polished politician, she's dome some real good stuff in her time, but for the issues that matter most to me I'm going with Trump. I'd like to see what someone like him will do for the country, I think he can get it back on track. I literally have no idea what makes you think he would do anything good for your country. I haven't heard a single credible, implementable policy position, and the overall assumption that being good a business means you'll be good as a President is laughably untrue. Now, I'm not doing any serious work to understand his policy positions, so I'm not saying this to suggest you're an idiot (you may be, but I don't have enough evidence). But I honestly cannot remember a time when a candidate got this far in any election and the only think I knew about his policy proposals was a ridiculous wall building idea. Hillary is just as thin on policy. She has a few white papers on her site to serve as a juxtaposition. If Trump was a supposed idealogue or wonk like Paul Overrated Ryan she wouldn't even bother. I have no illusions about Trump. It's all about stopping the RICO Statute caliber apparatus around the Clinton Foundation, DNC, and media and putting constitutionalists on the Supreme Court instead of the Pot Party acolytes. His tax plan is excellent, and the only realistic option to pay down the debt. Nobody wants to raise taxes or pursue austerity, so growth is it. Cutting the corporate tax is going to raise stock prices, and might even bring some of those dollars back to the states. Trump's trade policies are idiotic as is anything in the same neighborhood as Bernie Sanders. They'll send prices through the roof. Then maybe the demand for US made products raises and factories are built, or not. Any foreign policy is greater than Obama's and Clinton's. Any. Any. They're sharing intelligence with Cuba per Rubio. Yep. Anybody can beat what those two clowns have done.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Oct 22, 2016 4:48:30 GMT
I literally have no idea what makes you think he would do anything good for your country. I haven't heard a single credible, implementable policy position, and the overall assumption that being good a business means you'll be good as a President is laughably untrue. Now, I'm not doing any serious work to understand his policy positions, so I'm not saying this to suggest you're an idiot (you may be, but I don't have enough evidence). But I honestly cannot remember a time when a candidate got this far in any election and the only think I knew about his policy proposals was a ridiculous wall building idea. What would Hillary do that would be good for the country? His has more policies than just a wall protecting the boarders ( I love this idea)...I have a friend who became a border patrol agent in Texas, very frustrating, brushing water against the tide he says. The amounts of heroin, guns, machetes, cocaine and other drugs they seize pales in comparison to what gets in. They have two agents covering hundreds of miles when other countries have over 50 for the same area span. 9 overdoses in my town alone this week (4 in a 48 hour span) and it just keeps getting worse. You administer 2 people doses of Narcan in a hotel room while the other guy in the room (who doesn't belong in the country, never mind the room) is locked in the bathroom and has bullet with your name on it because he has other plans than being taken for the 2 warrants he has on him, then perhaps you'll have enough evidence to suggest I'm an idiot.
I'm in there saving a life while the "bad hombre" 6 feet away behind the door is figuring out how he's going to end mine.
Fuck him. Vote Trump.
Wow. That sucks really bad. I wouldn't want that job. The heroine is an enormous problem, it seems to me that its bigger in the more rural and suburban areas. Thank God it was't around in my drug abuse phase of life, I'm sure it would have gone worse for me than it did. As it was when we got desperate because our regular drugs couldn't be had we had other ways to get high with household items - I just cringe thinking about that time in my life. So yes, drugs coming in over the boarders are bad, but those that deal with their problems with drugs will always find a way. I think there should be more social programs to catch up with the at risk kids. At least things are better now. When I went to middle school with black eyes I remember just one teacher who said something about getting the police involved, but that idea crossed the line back at that time. It was that abuse that contributed to me self medicating with drugs and my teachers in high school knew it. Didn't get into much trouble with the law, never got busted, just spent one night in jail PC - state police barracks in Athol - and how I managed to get way the fuck out into Athol is a whole 'nother story.
|
|
|
Post by stevegm on Oct 22, 2016 11:01:04 GMT
I literally have no idea what makes you think he would do anything good for your country. I haven't heard a single credible, implementable policy position, and the overall assumption that being good a business means you'll be good as a President is laughably untrue. Now, I'm not doing any serious work to understand his policy positions, so I'm not saying this to suggest you're an idiot (you may be, but I don't have enough evidence). But I honestly cannot remember a time when a candidate got this far in any election and the only think I knew about his policy proposals was a ridiculous wall building idea. Hillary is just as thin on policy. She has a few white papers on her site to serve as a juxtaposition. If Trump was a supposed idealogue or wonk like Paul Overrated Ryan she wouldn't even bother. I have no illusions about Trump. It's all about stopping the RICO Statute caliber apparatus around the Clinton Foundation, DNC, and media and putting constitutionalists on the Supreme Court instead of the Pot Party acolytes. His tax plan is excellent, and the only realistic option to pay down the debt. Nobody wants to raise taxes or pursue austerity, so growth is it. Cutting the corporate tax is going to raise stock prices, and might even bring some of those dollars back to the states. Trump's trade policies are idiotic as is anything in the same neighborhood as Bernie Sanders. They'll send prices through the roof. Then maybe the demand for US made products raises and factories are built, or not. Any foreign policy is greater than Obama's and Clinton's. Any. Any. They're sharing intelligence with Cuba per Rubio. Yep. Anybody can beat what those two clowns have done. The "policy" card always rankles me. The reason "personal shit and drama", is all they're talking about, and especially "advertising" about, is that they really have no core policies. Politics is simply about power, not ideology. I'm absolutely sure in my own mind, both candidates aren't far apart on guns and abortion. But the political machine puts them both hopelessly out in left field on both issues. And the reason they do it, isn't principle, it's strategy, and it's pay back. On one of the issues that was discussed briefly(can't remember which, immigration maybe), before turning into the usual rasslin, Hillary intelligently stated there's a lot of real estate between open doors, and giving every known out of country criminal, free access to the country. But the "issues", never come out. This election is like the absolute worst, that ever happens around here. And it's not spirited debate I'm talking about. It's about attempting to move a conversation, deflection and emotional dishonesty, rather than concede a good point someone else makes.
How often do we have conversations that go something like this. Someone talks about what a great face off man Sanderson was. Someone else disagree's. As both parties escalate their data and fervor..one side starts to appear to have the strongest logic. Let's say the pro Sanderson side. You can bet your boots, the ensuing conversations from the "anti' side, will feature virtually all of the following points. 1. you're such a know-it-all. 2. Why do you think Sanderson is God. there are hundreds of players better than him. Can't believe you're so stupid. 3. Everybody hates you here. 4. I'm positive, you're negative.
IMO, Hillary isn't where she is, because she's the best the Dems could find. She's there because of the power she wields within a cronyist establishment. The GOP is no different, except in this case, Trump is there(and also unqualified) to the absolute dismay of an equally cronyist, ,self serving establishment. His "power" comes from outside of that bullshit environment(although where his comes from, is equally bullshit, it just isn't as politically partisan).
The only reason this thing is even remotely close, is because the whole country is getting sick of status quo politics. One candidate absolutely imbodies it, and the other is polar opposite. The country absolutely, imo, desperately favours the latter, but unfortunately, that package comes in the form of Donald Trump, and most balanced, free thinkers see a pretty big down side there.
Could be some surprises on election day though. I still think there are a lot of voters, who in private will say, fuck it, I want foundational change, so I'm gonna vote for the idiot.
The GOP establishment though, must be about ready to implode. Had any one of the other candidates got the nod....any of them...they'd have been out front by miles.
One final thought about "accepting the verdict" and all of the furor over that. The party turned itself inside out, trying to figure out a way to "unaccept' numbnuts. Some of the heaviest of hitters, still refuse. Why isn't that undemocratic. Why are many Republicans so unrepentant. Why didn't the Democrats pounce on this? Same answer for both sides. It's all about winning. Hillary and company are thanking the heavens, they're running against Donald. And the crotchety Republicans, that tried to throw Trump out? Well they feel they should be able to do whatever they want, in the pursuit of winning.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2016 13:15:35 GMT
Hillary is just as thin on policy. She has a few white papers on her site to serve as a juxtaposition. If Trump was a supposed idealogue or wonk like Paul Overrated Ryan she wouldn't even bother. I have no illusions about Trump. It's all about stopping the RICO Statute caliber apparatus around the Clinton Foundation, DNC, and media and putting constitutionalists on the Supreme Court instead of the Pot Party acolytes. His tax plan is excellent, and the only realistic option to pay down the debt. Nobody wants to raise taxes or pursue austerity, so growth is it. Cutting the corporate tax is going to raise stock prices, and might even bring some of those dollars back to the states. Trump's trade policies are idiotic as is anything in the same neighborhood as Bernie Sanders. They'll send prices through the roof. Then maybe the demand for US made products raises and factories are built, or not. Any foreign policy is greater than Obama's and Clinton's. Any. Any. They're sharing intelligence with Cuba per Rubio. Yep. Anybody can beat what those two clowns have done. The "policy" card always rankles me. The reason "personal shit and drama", is all they're talking about, and especially "advertising" about, is that they really have no core policies. Politics is simply about power, not ideology. I'm absolutely sure in my own mind, both candidates aren't far apart on guns and abortion. But the political machine puts them both hopelessly out in left field on both issues. And the reason they do it, isn't principle, it's strategy, and it's pay back. On one of the issues that was discussed briefly(can't remember which, immigration maybe), before turning into the usual rasslin, Hillary intelligently stated there's a lot of real estate between open doors, and giving every known out of country criminal, free access to the country. But the "issues", never come out. This election is like the absolute worst, that ever happens around here. And it's not spirited debate I'm talking about. It's about attempting to move a conversation, deflection and emotional dishonesty, rather than concede a good point someone else makes.
How often do we have conversations that go something like this. Someone talks about what a great face off man Sanderson was. Someone else disagree's. As both parties escalate their data and fervor..one side starts to appear to have the strongest logic. Let's say the pro Sanderson side. You can bet your boots, the ensuing conversations from the "anti' side, will feature virtually all of the following points. 1. you're such a know-it-all. 2. Why do you think Sanderson is God. there are hundreds of players better than him. Can't believe you're so stupid. 3. Everybody hates you here. 4. I'm positive, you're negative.
IMO, Hillary isn't where she is, because she's the best the Dems could find. She's there because of the power she wields within a cronyist establishment. The GOP is no different, except in this case, Trump is there(and also unqualified) to the absolute dismay of an equally cronyist, ,self serving establishment. His "power" comes from outside of that bullshit environment(although where his comes from, is equally bullshit, it just isn't as politically partisan).
The only reason this thing is even remotely close, is because the whole country is getting sick of status quo politics. One candidate absolutely imbodies it, and the other is polar opposite. The country absolutely, imo, desperately favours the latter, but unfortunately, that package comes in the form of Donald Trump, and most balanced, free thinkers see a pretty big down side there.
Could be some surprises on election day though. I still think there are a lot of voters, who in private will say, fuck it, I want foundational change, so I'm gonna vote for the idiot.
The GOP establishment though, must be about ready to implode. Had any one of the other candidates got the nod....any of them...they'd have been out front by miles.
One final thought about "accepting the verdict" and all of the furor over that. The party turned itself inside out, trying to figure out a way to "unaccept' numbnuts. Some of the heaviest of hitters, still refuse. Why isn't that undemocratic. Why are many Republicans so unrepentant. Why didn't the Democrats pounce on this? Same answer for both sides. It's all about winning. Hillary and company are thanking the heavens, they're running against Donald. And the crotchety Republicans, that tried to throw Trump out? Well they feel they should be able to do whatever they want, in the pursuit of winning. Yeah, I agree, and every person with half a brain knows how the Clinton II Presidency will play out. There's going to be a steady drip from the email scandal until they find a direct link or someone comes forward with hard evidence of quid pro quo between the State Department and the Clinton Foundation. Then the GOP will get a supermajority in the midterms (dummies don't vote in the midterms and they always clean up anyways) and move to impeach the Hag. The Clintons are bad people. Bill's charisma and economic track record are they only thing keeping that family from ignominy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2016 14:03:41 GMT
I wonder if Monica Lewinsky has any lesbian tendencies? That would be somethimg else.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Oct 22, 2016 14:35:26 GMT
Yeah, I agree, and every person with half a brain knows how the Clinton II Presidency will play out. There's going to be a steady drip from the email scandal until they find a direct link or someone comes forward with hard evidence of quid pro quo between the State Department and the Clinton Foundation. Then the GOP will get a supermajority in the midterms (dummies don't vote in the midterms and they always clean up anyways) and move to impeach the Hag. The Clintons are bad people. Bill's charisma and economic track record are they only thing keeping that family from ignominy. Really? Anyone with "half a brain". The intellectual trump card - just insult the other person and their candidate. Does it work both ways? You fucking moron. The Trumps, all of them are bad people. Just wait until the rape charges, Trump U, the skimming off Trump Foundation get hard evidence and then Trump will be in federal prison. OK, now we're getting someplace discussing this.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2016 14:45:27 GMT
Trump might be a scumbag, but he's not a do-nothing career hack. He'll get shit done. Steve has a good point...will America just end up saying fawk you to the status quo in the voting booth?? It will be interesting.
|
|
|
Post by 50belowzero on Oct 22, 2016 14:48:13 GMT
Trump might be a scumbag, but he's not a do-nothing career hack. He'll get shit done. Steve has a good point...will America just end up saying fawk you to the status quo in the voting booth?? It will be interesting. Hang, don't waste your talents here, why don't you get back to the "Milan Lucic is the greatest hockey player of all-time" thread.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2016 14:53:52 GMT
Trump might be a scumbag, but he's not a do-nothing career hack. He'll get shit done. Steve has a good point...will America just end up saying fawk you to the status quo in the voting booth?? It will be interesting. Hang, don't waste your talents here, why don't you get back to the "Milan Lucic is the greatest hockey player of all-time" thread. I hear ya, I fawkin hate politics.
|
|
|
Post by UtahGetMeTwo on Oct 22, 2016 14:59:02 GMT
Hear we go again with supply side economics. Cutting taxes does not bring revenue and bring the debt down. Reagan sent the debt through the roof with his spending and tax breaks. Ending the Fed, ending tax loopholes, ending foreign wars, end giving billions of corporate welfare out, giving money to foreign country's and having a surplus from getting money into the middle class hands will bring down the debt. And make the lousy Red State, takers bring revenue in at the state level.Instead of taking money back through pork fat earmarks in Bills.
Both Billary's and Dumpsters tax plans will add to the debt. Both tax plans are backwards.
|
|
|
Post by Fletcher on Oct 22, 2016 15:00:38 GMT
Enough of this, are you Massholes gonna legalize weed or not?
I want to know if my plan to drive a dozen suitcases full of kush back to Mass is still going to be a smart endeavor or not...
Kel, could you suggest a few business partners for me? Nobody who yanks teeth out with pliers, but someone who can move product?
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Oct 22, 2016 16:30:31 GMT
Enough of this, are you Massholes gonna legalize weed or not? I want to know if my plan to drive a dozen suitcases full of kush back to Mass is still going to be a smart endeavor or not... Kel, could you suggest a few business partners for me? Nobody who yanks teeth out with pliers, but someone who can move product? I strongly disapprove of this.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Oct 22, 2016 18:26:56 GMT
Hear we go again with supply side economics. Cutting taxes does not bring revenue and bring the debt down. Reagan sent the debt through the roof with his spending and tax breaks. Ending the Fed, ending tax loopholes, ending foreign wars, end giving billions of corporate welfare out, giving money to foreign country's and having a surplus from getting money into the middle class hands will bring down the debt. And make the lousy Red State, takers bring revenue in at the state level.Instead of taking money back through pork fat earmarks in Bills. Both Billary's and Dumpsters tax plans will add to the debt. Both tax plans are backwards. But Billary's tax plan won't add as much to the debt as Trump will. I have no idea where henry gets the idea Trump's tax plan is better, every *respectable* economist there is says his plan will raise taxes on the middle class and send the debt through the roof
|
|
|
Post by UtahGetMeTwo on Oct 22, 2016 19:28:13 GMT
Henry tries very hard, likes he part of the rich elitist class, to think that trickle down wasn't a trick that was played on the middle class. Giving the rich tax breaks to CEOs and Hedge Fund managers just gave the powerful more money to buy elections and more yachts. Nothing but "voodoo economics", a big fat lie.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Oct 22, 2016 20:08:08 GMT
Henry tries very hard, likes he part of the rich elitist class, to think that trickle down wasn't a trick that was played on the middle class. Giving the rich tax breaks to CEOs and Hedge Fund managers just gave the powerful more money to buy elections and more yachts. Nothing but "voodoo economics", a big fat lie. It's pretty obvious he only gets his information from fox noise, breitbart and convicted felons like this O'Keefe idiot, add that to a closed mind and the habs and there you go...
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Oct 25, 2016 11:59:11 GMT
Vote for tacos. Then all sides win. The more I learn about both parties and candidates, the more I like the idea of a 6' corn tortilla filled with spicy meat, cheese, and crisp vegetables governing your country. "Putin will eat your candidate alive!!!" "Exactly! Do you know what will happen to anyone who eats a 6' taco?!?!"
|
|