|
Post by chappy28 on Jun 6, 2023 13:40:51 GMT
For a guy who is usually doing the right thing, he sure seems OK fucking with Sweeney's ability to make a plan for this organization. Love the guy, but hate this waiting game. It's selfish and it is not what's best for the Bruins. If Bergy isn't coming back, Sweeney needs to be free to make moves before the DRAFT. Not just free agency. That's when the official off-season roster building begins. Especially in a year like this one that has a dozen or so potential top centers coming out in the first round. Last I checked we have a major need there.
|
|
|
Post by sandogbrewin on Jun 6, 2023 14:21:25 GMT
And why Sweeney should make plans without either Bergeron or Krejci. It's detrimental to the 2024 plans to wait around.
|
|
|
Post by chappy28 on Jun 6, 2023 14:32:34 GMT
And why Sweeney should make plans without either Bergeron or Krejci. It's detrimental to the 2024 plans to wait around. Sometimes I think that because Sweeney and Neely are both ex-Bruins players who spent their whole career in Boston there is a bit too much deference to our aging stars. Put me in the camp that thinks that Chara could have been traded in the latter years of his contract to recoup some major value. Bergy and DK are a different story because we are so thin at center. Marchand is the next story --- the truth is he gets us into the top half of the first round no problem and is a hugely valuable trade chip. However the question is whether Sweeney will put his respect for Brad as a life-long Bruin over the business decision that probably says he could be a HUGE deadline trade chip this upcoming year. I don't think Sweeney should just walk away from Bergy and DK, but I do think he should a) decide if he even wants BOTH of them back vs. just one and letting Zacha take over at 2C; and b) tell them both that he needs to know by a deadline (now) and that no answer by that deadline will force the team to move on ----- essentially tell me if you want to play by June or I'm moving in another direction. This "no timeline" approach is absolute bullshit from a business perspective. Of course there's a timeline. Gotta put the team before the individual. Period.
|
|
|
Post by umainebruinsfan on Jun 6, 2023 15:39:58 GMT
I love Bergie, and to a slightly lesser extend Krejci. True, we are thin at C, but there ABSOLUTELY has to be a deadline, and it needs to be very soon. We need to make backup plans at C, and with little to no money available, that might mean trying to trade back into the 1st round, or trade for a young C (like Shane Wright) who hasn't gotten his chance yet, and all those things seem to happen near the draft. We can't afford to wait until free agency, because a top line C or even a 2nd line C will cost more money than we have cap space for. We need to find a C in a more creative way, and we can't be waiting around or those options could no longer exist.
|
|
|
Post by sandogbrewin on Jun 6, 2023 15:58:55 GMT
And why Sweeney should make plans without either Bergeron or Krejci. It's detrimental to the 2024 plans to wait around. Sometimes I think that because Sweeney and Neely are both ex-Bruins players who spent their whole career in Boston there is a bit too much deference to our aging stars. Put me in the camp that thinks that Chara could have been traded in the latter years of his contract to recoup some major value. Bergy and DK are a different story because we are so thin at center. Marchand is the next story --- the truth is he gets us into the top half of the first round no problem and is a hugely valuable trade chip. However the question is whether Sweeney will put his respect for Brad as a life-long Bruin over the business decision that probably says he could be a HUGE deadline trade chip this upcoming year. I don't think Sweeney should just walk away from Bergy and DK, but I do think he should a) decide if he even wants BOTH of them back vs. just one and letting Zacha take over at 2C; and b) tell them both that he needs to know by a deadline (now) and that no answer by that deadline will force the team to move on ----- essentially tell me if you want to play by June or I'm moving in another direction. This "no timeline" approach is absolute bullshit from a business perspective. Of course there's a timeline. Gotta put the team before the individual. Period. Sweeney does need to know on both before the draft. Horton was acquired right before the 2010 draft. Especially if it's true what Freidman mentioned, moving money around to keep Bertuzzi.
|
|
|
Post by thanx4memORRies on Jun 6, 2023 16:05:21 GMT
And why Sweeney should make plans without either Bergeron or Krejci. It's detrimental to the 2024 plans to wait around. Sometimes I think that because Sweeney and Neely are both ex-Bruins players who spent their whole career in Boston there is a bit too much deference to our aging stars. Put me in the camp that thinks that Chara could have been traded in the latter years of his contract to recoup some major value. Bergy and DK are a different story because we are so thin at center. Marchand is the next story --- the truth is he gets us into the top half of the first round no problem and is a hugely valuable trade chip. However the question is whether Sweeney will put his respect for Brad as a life-long Bruin over the business decision that probably says he could be a HUGE deadline trade chip this upcoming year. I don't think Sweeney should just walk away from Bergy and DK, but I do think he should a) decide if he even wants BOTH of them back vs. just one and letting Zacha take over at 2C; and b) tell them both that he needs to know by a deadline (now) and that no answer by that deadline will force the team to move on ----- essentially tell me if you want to play by June or I'm moving in another direction. This "no timeline" approach is absolute bullshit from a business perspective. Of course there's a timeline. Gotta put the team before the individual. Period. Another child on the way, so apparently Bergy has other things on his mind…. One would think that he saw this coming months ago…. Also says he wants to talk about it with the family…. Hope he’s not waiting on the newborn’s response…. Have a feeling that Bergy will return for a 20th and probably final season but that Krejci will be calling it a day…. B’S are to blame for allowing indecisions to drag on….
|
|
|
Post by 50belowzero on Jun 6, 2023 19:08:54 GMT
I seem to remember saying on final locker room clearout day that he would have an answer shortly, it wouldn't take long. Well then either he's told Sweeney already and there's no rush to tell anyone else. As far as Bergy who knows but i think he needs to let the team know sooner rather than later.
|
|
|
Post by thanx4memORRies on Jun 6, 2023 19:27:31 GMT
I seem to remember saying on final locker room clearout day that he would have an answer shortly, it wouldn't take long. Well then either he's told Sweeney already and there's no rush to tell anyone else. As far as Bergy who knows but i think he needs to let the team know sooner rather than later. Think Krejci’s the one who said that….
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Jun 6, 2023 19:30:06 GMT
Sometimes I think that because Sweeney and Neely are both ex-Bruins players who spent their whole career in Boston there is a bit too much deference to our aging stars. Put me in the camp that thinks that Chara could have been traded in the latter years of his contract to recoup some major value. Bergy and DK are a different story because we are so thin at center. Marchand is the next story --- the truth is he gets us into the top half of the first round no problem and is a hugely valuable trade chip. However the question is whether Sweeney will put his respect for Brad as a life-long Bruin over the business decision that probably says he could be a HUGE deadline trade chip this upcoming year. I don't think Sweeney should just walk away from Bergy and DK, but I do think he should a) decide if he even wants BOTH of them back vs. just one and letting Zacha take over at 2C; and b) tell them both that he needs to know by a deadline (now) and that no answer by that deadline will force the team to move on ----- essentially tell me if you want to play by June or I'm moving in another direction. This "no timeline" approach is absolute bullshit from a business perspective. Of course there's a timeline. Gotta put the team before the individual. Period. Another child on the way, so apparently Bergy has other things on his mind…. One would think that he saw this coming months ago…. Also says he wants to talk about it with the family…. Hope he’s not waiting on the newborn’s response…. Have a feeling that Bergy will return for a 20th and probably final season but that Krejci will be calling it a day…. B’S are to blame for allowing indecisions to drag on…. Honestly, people get so bent out of shape about Bergeron taking time to make a decision, you'd think he was a guy just coming of an ELC. To quote Aaron Rogers "R-E-L-A-X". 1. Worst thing Bergeron could do is rush the decision to come back and then realize in September that it was a mistake and retire. No reason he couldn't do that, and it would screw the Bruins far more than waiting. 2. Your point about the Bs being to blame is mostly correct. If management actually needed a timeline, they should communicate that to Bergeron. Everything that has been shared in print leads me to believe that they don't actually feel like the indecision is a problem for them. 3. Bergeron and Krejci are basically looking at 4th liner money. Maybe Bergeron gets a little more again? Plus bonuses, but that's next year's problem. It's not like they need to avoid a big splash like a Bertuzzi signing to fit Bergeron in later if he decides he's coming back. 4. I don't think it changes anything about the need to get another younger centre who can be the heir apparent. Didn't slow them down last year when they acquired Zacha during the wait. If you get him and Bergeron comes back, someone plays a year on the wing - maybe Zacha, maybe the new guy, maybe Coyle. The reason you want a young guy is for the long term, so shuffling a bit because you have Patrice Bergeron's a small inconvenience. He's technically still under contract for a month.
|
|
|
Post by 50belowzero on Jun 6, 2023 19:38:37 GMT
I seem to remember saying on final locker room clearout day that he would have an answer shortly, it wouldn't take long. Well then either he's told Sweeney already and there's no rush to tell anyone else. As far as Bergy who knows but i think he needs to let the team know sooner rather than later. Think Krejci’s the one who said that…. It was, forgot to put his name in there.
|
|
|
Post by 50belowzero on Jun 6, 2023 19:39:10 GMT
I seem to remember saying on final locker room clearout day that he would have an answer shortly, it wouldn't take long. Well then either he's told Sweeney already and there's no rush to tell anyone else. As far as Bergy who knows but i think he needs to let the team know sooner rather than later. Think Krejci’s the one who said that…. Yeah Bergeron gave no timeline.
|
|
|
Post by sandogbrewin on Jun 6, 2023 20:13:42 GMT
I seem to remember saying on final locker room clearout day that he would have an answer shortly, it wouldn't take long. Well then either he's told Sweeney already and there's no rush to tell anyone else. As far as Bergy who knows but i think he needs to let the team know sooner rather than later. Krejci said he would let the team know soon as in not like last season. Bergeron said by July 1st. But recently Bergy sounds like he is being indecisive...again. Sweeney cannot allow this again.
|
|
|
Post by thanx4memORRies on Jun 6, 2023 21:19:05 GMT
Another child on the way, so apparently Bergy has other things on his mind…. One would think that he saw this coming months ago…. Also says he wants to talk about it with the family…. Hope he’s not waiting on the newborn’s response…. Have a feeling that Bergy will return for a 20th and probably final season but that Krejci will be calling it a day…. B’S are to blame for allowing indecisions to drag on…. Honestly, people get so bent out of shape about Bergeron taking time to make a decision, you'd think he was a guy just coming of an ELC. To quote Aaron Rogers "R-E-L-A-X". 1. Worst thing Bergeron could do is rush the decision to come back and then realize in September that it was a mistake and retire. No reason he couldn't do that, and it would screw the Bruins far more than waiting. 2. Your point about the Bs being to blame is mostly correct. If management actually needed a timeline, they should communicate that to Bergeron. Everything that has been shared in print leads me to believe that they don't actually feel like the indecision is a problem for them. 3. Bergeron and Krejci are basically looking at 4th liner money. Maybe Bergeron gets a little more again? Plus bonuses, but that's next year's problem. It's not like they need to avoid a big splash like a Bertuzzi signing to fit Bergeron in later if he decides he's coming back. 4. I don't think it changes anything about the need to get another younger centre who can be the heir apparent. Didn't slow them down last year when they acquired Zacha during the wait. If you get him and Bergeron comes back, someone plays a year on the wing - maybe Zacha, maybe the new guy, maybe Coyle. The reason you want a young guy is for the long term, so shuffling a bit because you have Patrice Bergeron's a small inconvenience. He's technically still under contract for a month. Good points all around….
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Jun 6, 2023 22:23:43 GMT
I seem to remember saying on final locker room clearout day that he would have an answer shortly, it wouldn't take long. Well then either he's told Sweeney already and there's no rush to tell anyone else. As far as Bergy who knows but i think he needs to let the team know sooner rather than later. Krejci said he would let the team know soon as in not like last season. Bergeron said by July 1st. But recently Bergy sounds like he is being indecisive...again. Sweeney cannot allow this again. Why not? Proceed as if he's not coming back; if he decides to come back for a mil plus bonuses, send someone to the A. And seriously, there's not much in this for playing hardball. Sweeney says OK Bergy, enough dawdling. What's your answer? Bergeron says, I don't know. Sweeney says well, then we're moving on without you! A month later the phone rings. "Don, it's Patrice. I'm ready to sign." What are the odds that Sweeney says "I'm sorry, Patrice, we moved on and we don't want you at $1M plus bonuses now..."? HoF Captain 6xSelke winner and your erstwhile #1C and probably best C option for next year and you're gonna get your panties twisted because he wants to take his time? I just don't see it.
|
|
|
Post by sandogbrewin on Jun 7, 2023 11:04:13 GMT
Don't think it would be too hard for Sweeney to keep a $1.5M cushion after moving pieces around.
|
|
|
Post by islamorada on Jun 7, 2023 11:16:12 GMT
Bergeron is probably just as aware of the timing of his decision as DS. Although it may not be a particular day, it is undoubtedly a certain week. As noted, DS needs to get rid of some contracts though package deals. It is doable if he proactive. This is not the 2015 version of DS. The recent Flyers trade is indicative of the GM interaction now occurring to a large degree.
|
|
|
Post by chappy28 on Jun 7, 2023 12:29:26 GMT
Sometimes I think that because Sweeney and Neely are both ex-Bruins players who spent their whole career in Boston there is a bit too much deference to our aging stars. Put me in the camp that thinks that Chara could have been traded in the latter years of his contract to recoup some major value. Bergy and DK are a different story because we are so thin at center. Marchand is the next story --- the truth is he gets us into the top half of the first round no problem and is a hugely valuable trade chip. However the question is whether Sweeney will put his respect for Brad as a life-long Bruin over the business decision that probably says he could be a HUGE deadline trade chip this upcoming year. I don't think Sweeney should just walk away from Bergy and DK, but I do think he should a) decide if he even wants BOTH of them back vs. just one and letting Zacha take over at 2C; and b) tell them both that he needs to know by a deadline (now) and that no answer by that deadline will force the team to move on ----- essentially tell me if you want to play by June or I'm moving in another direction. This "no timeline" approach is absolute bullshit from a business perspective. Of course there's a timeline. Gotta put the team before the individual. Period. Another child on the way, so apparently Bergy has other things on his mind…. One would think that he saw this coming months ago…. Also says he wants to talk about it with the family…. Hope he’s not waiting on the newborn’s response…. Have a feeling that Bergy will return for a 20th and probably final season but that Krejci will be calling it a day…. B’S are to blame for allowing indecisions to drag on…. New baby? I think he's done then. That's the kind of thing that would make you hang em up
|
|
|
Post by chappy28 on Jun 7, 2023 12:33:09 GMT
Another child on the way, so apparently Bergy has other things on his mind…. One would think that he saw this coming months ago…. Also says he wants to talk about it with the family…. Hope he’s not waiting on the newborn’s response…. Have a feeling that Bergy will return for a 20th and probably final season but that Krejci will be calling it a day…. B’S are to blame for allowing indecisions to drag on…. Honestly, people get so bent out of shape about Bergeron taking time to make a decision, you'd think he was a guy just coming of an ELC. To quote Aaron Rogers "R-E-L-A-X". 1. Worst thing Bergeron could do is rush the decision to come back and then realize in September that it was a mistake and retire. No reason he couldn't do that, and it would screw the Bruins far more than waiting. 2. Your point about the Bs being to blame is mostly correct. If management actually needed a timeline, they should communicate that to Bergeron. Everything that has been shared in print leads me to believe that they don't actually feel like the indecision is a problem for them. 3. Bergeron and Krejci are basically looking at 4th liner money. Maybe Bergeron gets a little more again? Plus bonuses, but that's next year's problem. It's not like they need to avoid a big splash like a Bertuzzi signing to fit Bergeron in later if he decides he's coming back. 4. I don't think it changes anything about the need to get another younger centre who can be the heir apparent. Didn't slow them down last year when they acquired Zacha during the wait. If you get him and Bergeron comes back, someone plays a year on the wing - maybe Zacha, maybe the new guy, maybe Coyle. The reason you want a young guy is for the long term, so shuffling a bit because you have Patrice Bergeron's a small inconvenience. He's technically still under contract for a month. 1. I have zero concern with this. Bergy would not commit and then back out mid season. Just not his style. 2. Yes -- Sweeney is supposed to be in charge, not the other way around. 3. Wrong, cap is far TOO TIGHT to just keep a few million kicking around just in case these guy want to play. As is we need to move guys just to build a roster. We used up our extra money last year, this year we start with overages from last seasons Bergy and DK deals which are more than their salaries were. 4. It changes because Sweeney is either in a retool/rebuild mode, or he's in a load up for another run mode. I'm not saying we are going to tank without those guys, but it does change the expectations for the season significantly
|
|
|
Post by dannycater on Jun 7, 2023 13:43:52 GMT
Krejci said he would let the team know soon as in not like last season. Bergeron said by July 1st. But recently Bergy sounds like he is being indecisive...again. Sweeney cannot allow this again. Why not? Proceed as if he's not coming back; if he decides to come back for a mil plus bonuses, send someone to the A. And seriously, there's not much in this for playing hardball. Sweeney says OK Bergy, enough dawdling. What's your answer? Bergeron says, I don't know. Sweeney says well, then we're moving on without you! A month later the phone rings. "Don, it's Patrice. I'm ready to sign." What are the odds that Sweeney says "I'm sorry, Patrice, we moved on and we don't want you at $1M plus bonuses now..."? HoF Captain 6xSelke winner and your erstwhile #1C and probably best C option for next year and you're gonna get your panties twisted because he wants to take his time? I just don't see it. It's different from Chara...they just more or less announced to him "We are moving on from your main D role." He saw handwriting on wall, pouted, left to Caps. Certainly not impactful but pretty good on Caps (debatable if he would have been on B's)....Agreed on 37. He basically has earned the right and has the skill set that if he waited until pre-season games to decide, they would take him back with open arms on a team-friendly 1-year deal.
|
|
|
Post by stevegm on Jun 7, 2023 13:47:22 GMT
And why Sweeney should make plans without either Bergeron or Krejci. It's detrimental to the 2024 plans to wait around. I'm sure Sweeney is working a plan that doesn't include 37. I really don't think that's an issue holding back the Bruins. On the other hand, I agree all this drama Bergeron is creating, is bullshit. And it was last year too. He's plenty good enough to play, and that's a pure blessing, he's putting himself far above. That's bullshit too. Only reason he isn't considering coming back...is he's already rich enough...he simply doesn't need to. That's an entitled 37 year old speaking. Poor guy not sure he wants to work a 7 month job for millions, after falling on his ass, and under delivering. He is a fekin flake, if he's content to go out after this disaster. If he does not have an absolute fire, and feel consumed to have his final chapter written in a much better light than this one....he is not the role model we've been duped into believing. He's no Captain.
|
|
|
Post by dannycater on Jun 7, 2023 14:11:15 GMT
And why Sweeney should make plans without either Bergeron or Krejci. It's detrimental to the 2024 plans to wait around. I'm sure Sweeney is working a plan that doesn't include 37. I really don't think that's an issue holding back the Bruins. On the other hand, I agree all this drama Bergeron is creating, is bullshit. And it was last year too. He's plenty good enough to play, and that's a pure blessing, he's putting himself far above. That's bullshit too. Only reason he isn't considering coming back...is he's already rich enough...he simply doesn't need to. That's an entitled 37 year old speaking. Poor guy not sure he wants to work a 7 month job for millions, after falling on his ass, and under delivering. He is a fekin flake, if he's content to go out after this disaster. If he does not have an absolute fire, and feel consumed to have his final chapter written in a much better light than this one....he is not the role model we've been duped into believing. He's no Captain. boy, I never thought you would "criticize" the great 37. Maybe he is just done because tired of his own injuries getting in the way of the elusive 2nd Cup and Father Time with family now having to be a priority not an accessory (pro athletes life dilemma). But he is financially fine for the rest of his life (unless you have poor investment advisors or those that steal money) and I do think he is just never sure about things while pondering in off-season...Krejci same way...as for your take on role model--bull to your shit...as for fire to play now because of Florida debacle....sometimes you just can't time your exits. Brady I bet would have retired after Tampa Super Bowl if he did it all over again. But he went on with a whimper, poor year for Bucs (he was good though). Bird went out with a bad back and no great victories at the end. Yaz played on a shitty Red Sox team and hit 100 over the last month, and was painfully embarrassing on his late swings (Williams leaves on a HR but his worst batting average season--but also a bad team). Orr could barely move at the end--and his case he did have his great finish--the 1976 Canada Cup where he was fucking brilliant. You can pick your exits--win a title--Russell/Celts leaving on top--,retire too soon, or you hang on and hang on some more...Unitas-Chargers, Namath-Rams..Chara goes to 2 teams after B's, Jagr bounced around, Gretzky was Not So Great One with Blues--hell I felt bad for him, he just looked like a guy who was Okay Gretz at end...so enough about Captain bullshit...I ripped his ass for other reasons, selfishness being one...Others have argued that what he did was not selfish, but it wasn't for the "good of the team." But as for continuing career? That's up to him. He plays or he doesn't....he is a great fucking Hall of Famer one way or the other and if takes a few months to decide, so be it. He earned that right.
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Jun 7, 2023 15:07:06 GMT
Honestly, people get so bent out of shape about Bergeron taking time to make a decision, you'd think he was a guy just coming of an ELC. To quote Aaron Rogers "R-E-L-A-X". 1. Worst thing Bergeron could do is rush the decision to come back and then realize in September that it was a mistake and retire. No reason he couldn't do that, and it would screw the Bruins far more than waiting. 2. Your point about the Bs being to blame is mostly correct. If management actually needed a timeline, they should communicate that to Bergeron. Everything that has been shared in print leads me to believe that they don't actually feel like the indecision is a problem for them. 3. Bergeron and Krejci are basically looking at 4th liner money. Maybe Bergeron gets a little more again? Plus bonuses, but that's next year's problem. It's not like they need to avoid a big splash like a Bertuzzi signing to fit Bergeron in later if he decides he's coming back. 4. I don't think it changes anything about the need to get another younger centre who can be the heir apparent. Didn't slow them down last year when they acquired Zacha during the wait. If you get him and Bergeron comes back, someone plays a year on the wing - maybe Zacha, maybe the new guy, maybe Coyle. The reason you want a young guy is for the long term, so shuffling a bit because you have Patrice Bergeron's a small inconvenience. He's technically still under contract for a month. 1. I have zero concern with this. Bergy would not commit and then back out mid season. Just not his style. 2. Yes -- Sweeney is supposed to be in charge, not the other way around. 3. Wrong, cap is far TOO TIGHT to just keep a few million kicking around just in case these guy want to play. As is we need to move guys just to build a roster. We used up our extra money last year, this year we start with overages from last seasons Bergy and DK deals which are more than their salaries were. 4. It changes because Sweeney is either in a retool/rebuild mode, or he's in a load up for another run mode. I'm not saying we are going to tank without those guys, but it does change the expectations for the season significantly 2. Yes, and I see no evidence that he isn't. If he felt he had to have an answer from Bergeron by a certain date or he wouldn't be able to do what's right for the franchise, he'd have told him so. He didn't which means he has planned for parallel paths with and without Bergeron. We know from the way they handled Chara's departure that they aren't shy about delivering bad news to legends. 3. There is no way that Sweeney can't simply put a fourth liner in the minors to make room for Bergeron's deal if it's what we expect it will be. As I said in response to Sandog, you go forward expecting that you don't have him, and then you make room for him if he decides to come back. Sweeney alluded to this in one of the post-season conferences. They have contingencies for this. They know what they want to do and how to inflect it for having and for not having Bergeron. See above.... 4. I don't think it does change much. There is no value to the Bruins in going into retool/rebuild mode in any way that they wouldn't do with Bergeron. They have committed about $32M to Pastrnak, Zacha, McAvoy and Lindholm to be the core for the next 6 years or so. Those are good players on big money contracts and you're not going to waste their prime years rebuilding or retooling with players who aren't ready to contribute in the very near term. Like I said above, they primary area where they have a need is at C. If you get a line on a younger C who you think can grow into a top line player or who is already pretty much there and you can make the trade to get him, you do it knowing that you want him for 8 years, not just next year, regardless of whether Bergeron comes back. Add to this that they don't really have the option to go 'all in' again because they don't have the resources, so they aren't at either extreme - can't take a step back in any way that helps them (no picks this year or next) and can't be competitive on the UFA market. They will put together the most competitive roster they can and try to catch lightning in a bottle. It will be on the players who make up the roster to elevate their games in the playoffs this year, because the front office won't be able to do the same things they did last year to try to give them help.
|
|
|
Post by sandogbrewin on Jun 7, 2023 15:49:29 GMT
I don't think it would be super hard to have $1.5M under the cap for a Bergeron return. Obviously pieces need to be moved first.
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Jun 7, 2023 16:21:51 GMT
I don't think it would be super hard to have $1.5M under the cap for a Bergeron return. Obviously pieces need to be moved first. They will inevitably have a player or two on the bottom of the depth chart who could be sent to the minors at little risk.
|
|
|
Post by thanx4memORRies on Jun 7, 2023 19:09:19 GMT
Another child on the way, so apparently Bergy has other things on his mind…. One would think that he saw this coming months ago…. Also says he wants to talk about it with the family…. Hope he’s not waiting on the newborn’s response…. Have a feeling that Bergy will return for a 20th and probably final season but that Krejci will be calling it a day…. B’S are to blame for allowing indecisions to drag on…. New baby? I think he's done then. That's the kind of thing that would make you hang em up I would think so too…. Another concussion could have an impact on the quality of life Bergy will have going forward…. Not to mention that he’s taking that chance while playing for peanuts…. Wife most probably not too keen on that either….
|
|