|
Post by sandogbrewin on Feb 29, 2024 16:30:18 GMT
I said the pp remained anemic…. As for Boychuck and McQuaid, those reclamation projects panned out pretty well imo…. Although that Lord Stanley winner will never be mistaken for the Shabs’, Isles’, or Oilers’ dynasties, it still had fewer question marks than this year’s B’S squad has heading into the postseason…. And substantially fewer…. I can't fathom how you think that. I really can't. When I think back to how people talked about them - from the lack of faith in Thomas, Krejci, Bergeron or Horton to the poor play of Kelly, Kaberle, and Pevs post trade to the lingering disdain for them as substantially thr same team that blew a 3-0/3-0. Agree to disagree, I guess. The fanbase hadn't bought in on the 2011 Bruins, post trade, is 100% correct. 2010 was still lingering.
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Feb 29, 2024 17:58:05 GMT
I can't fathom how you think that. I really can't. When I think back to how people talked about them - from the lack of faith in Thomas, Krejci, Bergeron or Horton to the poor play of Kelly, Kaberle, and Pevs post trade to the lingering disdain for them as substantially thr same team that blew a 3-0/3-0. Agree to disagree, I guess. The fanbase hadn't bought in on the 2011 Bruins, post trade, is 100% correct. 2010 was still lingering. Thank you. I'm getting old but not that old. I mean, wasn't it in 2011 that some guy famously referred to "Marchmont" complaining that the team sucked on WBZ?
|
|
|
Post by zamboni24 on Mar 1, 2024 3:51:24 GMT
The fanbase hadn't bought in on the 2011 Bruins, post trade, is 100% correct. 2010 was still lingering. Thank you. I'm getting old but not that old. I mean, wasn't it in 2011 that some guy famously referred to "Marchmont" complaining that the team sucked on WBZ? Could it have been Jack Edward’s?
|
|