|
Post by badhabitude on Aug 26, 2016 16:48:41 GMT
The political media is this country is such a fucking joke. The media is supposed to find the truth. The more I read out of the political media, the more is obvious that they aren't there to be journalists, they're there to influence people's opinions. I can respect the talk show hosts like Rush, Hannity, BOR because they don't present themselves as journalists. This garbage from the Times, the Huffington Post, etc is disgusting. I'm pissed off because I believed this when there was a perfect and logical explanation a grade schooler could figure out. There's no way the pinko that wrote that didn't try to deliberately mislead his readers. The same with the history writers. Why don't we get the Nazi perspective of WW2? Or what about these suicide terrorists? They obviously feel strongly enough to willingly give up their lives for things they believe in. Yet the media portrays them as blood thirsty deranged terrorists. Just how far do you want to take this? Back to the rent thing. What exactly are you saying? That they should not have reported it at all? Or should they have interpreted for the reader and spelled it out? Because you're not supposed to do that as a journalist. Give me the exact quotes where an interpretation was provided.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2016 17:04:10 GMT
The political media is this country is such a fucking joke. The media is supposed to find the truth. The more I read out of the political media, the more is obvious that they aren't there to be journalists, they're there to influence people's opinions. I can respect the talk show hosts like Rush, Hannity, BOR because they don't present themselves as journalists. This garbage from the Times, the Huffington Post, etc is disgusting. I'm pissed off because I believed this when there was a perfect and logical explanation a grade schooler could figure out. There's no way the pinko that wrote that didn't try to deliberately mislead his readers. The same with the history writers. Why don't we get the Nazi perspective of WW2? Or what about these suicide terrorists? They obviously feel strongly enough to willingly give up their lives for things they believe in. Yet the media portrays them as blood thirsty deranged terrorists. Just how far do you want to take this? Back to the rent thing. What exactly are you saying? That they should not have reported it at all? Or should they have interpreted for the reader and spelled it out? Because you're not supposed to do that as a journalist. Give me the exact quotes where an interpretation was provided. Isn't that what they are? What are you talking about. There's a fiction book that got some press a few months ago about suicide bombers. www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/04/04/the-association-of-small-bombs-reviewThey certainly did interpret the price increase for the reader in explicit causation. The text below the title is: "Office rent soared in July after Trump’s campaign began accepting donor contributions." www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-campaign-rent_us_57bba424e4b03d51368a82b9
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Aug 26, 2016 17:24:31 GMT
But the increase in rent did in fact happen after accepting donor contributions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2016 18:41:32 GMT
But the increase in rent did in fact happen after accepting donor contributions. Correlation and not causation.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Aug 26, 2016 20:10:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sportsnut on Aug 26, 2016 20:40:26 GMT
Rent-gate is such small potatoes compared to what is being (under)reported about Hillary as Sec of State... what a joke.
|
|
|
Post by walktheline on Aug 26, 2016 21:31:27 GMT
Yeah, but that person may actually have been sorta innocent and just was following Christie's orders. Sorta innocent like the Germans who gassed Jews in Auschwitz. But this is no different than the Hag hiring Disgraced Debbie 30 minutes after she was shamed into resigning as DNC Ubefuehrer. Look, these people deserve to work just like you and me. Is the company that employs you in the same boat of shame as Trumpet and Hitlery for employing you? After all, didn't you get kicked out of college for drunken and lewd behavior in the science lab where they keep all the monkeys? And where the hell did you ever find a disco ball and a prom dress to fit a monkey?
|
|
|
Post by bostonfan191646 on Sept 1, 2016 21:53:40 GMT
Tomi lahren is the cuntiest Cunt
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2016 12:32:03 GMT
Tomi lahren is the cuntiest Ulf Ugh, the Blaze. It's either Rush Limbaugh, or nobody. He's the only pundit out of all of them worth listening to. The InfoBabes are the worst. Speaking of the Fat Man, here's a funny clip from CSPAN: www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPXE7_tED8
|
|
|
Post by RichHillOntario on Sept 2, 2016 20:37:33 GMT
Tomi lahren is the cuntiest Ulf Ugh, the Blaze. It's either Rush Limbaugh, or nobody. He's the only pundit out of all of them worth listening to. The InfoBabes are the worst. Speaking of the Fat Man, here's a funny clip from CSPAN: www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPXE7_tED8The screen shot of Hillary Clinton that comes with that clip could keep away evil spirits.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2016 21:22:05 GMT
Ugh, the Blaze. It's either Rush Limbaugh, or nobody. He's the only pundit out of all of them worth listening to. The InfoBabes are the worst. Speaking of the Fat Man, here's a funny clip from CSPAN: www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPXE7_tED8The screen shot of Hillary Clinton that comes with that clip could keep away evil spirits. She makes Margaret Thatcher look like Marilyn Monroe.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 4, 2016 0:11:39 GMT
Tomi lahren is the cuntiest Ulf Ugh, the Blaze. It's either Rush Limbaugh, or nobody. He's the only pundit out of all of them worth listening to. The InfoBabes are the worst. Speaking of the Fat Man, here's a funny clip from CSPAN: www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPXE7_tED8Sorry about your divorce.
|
|
|
Post by islamorada on Sept 4, 2016 1:01:04 GMT
Tomi lahren is the cuntiest Ulf Ugh, the Blaze. It's either Rush Limbaugh, or nobody. He's the only pundit out of all of them worth listening to. The InfoBabes are the worst. Speaking of the Fat Man, here's a funny clip from CSPAN: www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPXE7_tED8A woman's scorn is deeper and a scaring than a man's worst tirade. Unforgiving and damning to the core. Only a few women and men can forgive and forget. This is why the Clinton's and the Trumps are not in tune with a greater self witnessed in the prose of Abraham Lincoln. The industrial communication revelations have produced dust compared to those who dared to visit inward rather than outward in their pursuit of the perceived goodness and straight forward thinking of some the great Presidents and statesmen. Theses are not the the worst disasters to run for President, they are who we are today. Thin and baseless as the timed life's we live. Their are no differences in these two candidates. I will vot for Trump as he is a demagogue who will be a catalyst for change.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 2:43:55 GMT
Ugh, the Blaze. It's either Rush Limbaugh, or nobody. He's the only pundit out of all of them worth listening to. The InfoBabes are the worst. Speaking of the Fat Man, here's a funny clip from CSPAN: www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPXE7_tED8A woman's scorn is deeper and a scaring than a man's worst tirade. Unforgiving and damning to the core. Only a few women and men can forgive and forget. This is why the Clinton's and the Trumps are not in tune with a greater self witnessed in the prose of Abraham Lincoln. The industrial communication revelations have produced dust compared to those who dared to visit inward rather than outward in their pursuit of the perceived goodness and straight forward thinking of some the great Presidents and statesmen. Theses are not the the worst disasters to run for President, they are who we are today. Thin and baseless as the timed life's we live. Their are no differences in these two candidates. I will vot for Trump as he is a demagogue who will be a catalyst for change. That's right! They aren't the worst candidates in history because of some accident, they are our candidates because they are who this country is at the moment, and the only alternatives were two token Hispanics put forth in a sisyphian effort to court demographics and a crypto-Communist. Trump and Hillary are the candidates this country deserves. We've got the unqualified goober who spends half his energies on Twitter beefs like a rapper one quarter his age, and the establishment twit (undeservedly) trying to run as an incumbent of a government nearly three quarters of the country thinks is taking us in the wrong direction. Do you pick someone whose record has shown will fail, or do you pick the guy with no experience that might fall even further? I'm going to take my chances.
|
|
|
Post by RichHillOntario on Sept 4, 2016 5:38:04 GMT
The screen shot of Hillary Clinton that comes with that clip could keep away evil spirits. She makes Margaret Thatcher look like Marilyn Monroe. Wonder if the face Bill Clinton saw privately was more fierce than the one shown in the screen shot when the Lewinski story blew up?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 13:31:15 GMT
She makes Margaret Thatcher look like Marilyn Monroe. Wonder if the face Bill Clinton saw privately was more fierce than the one shown in the screen shot when the Lewinski story blew up? Hahahahaha. I bet it was enough to drive him into the arms of about fifteen women.
|
|
|
Post by UtahGetMeTwo on Sept 4, 2016 15:11:27 GMT
Ugh, the Blaze. It's either Rush Limbaugh, or nobody. He's the only pundit out of all of them worth listening to. The InfoBabes are the worst. Speaking of the Fat Man, here's a funny clip from CSPAN: www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPXE7_tED8I will vot for Trump as he is a demagogue who will be a catalyst for change. The worse change you could possibly imagine. And it would start with his ridiculous tax plan and then his foreign policy.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 4, 2016 15:39:18 GMT
Ugh, the Blaze. It's either Rush Limbaugh, or nobody. He's the only pundit out of all of them worth listening to. The InfoBabes are the worst. Speaking of the Fat Man, here's a funny clip from CSPAN: www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPXE7_tED8A woman's scorn is deeper and a scaring than a man's worst tirade. Unforgiving and damning to the core. Only a few women and men can forgive and forget. This is why the Clinton's and the Trumps are not in tune with a greater self witnessed in the prose of Abraham Lincoln. The industrial communication revelations have produced dust compared to those who dared to visit inward rather than outward in their pursuit of the perceived goodness and straight forward thinking of some the great Presidents and statesmen. Theses are not the the worst disasters to run for President, they are who we are today. Thin and baseless as the timed life's we live. Their are no differences in these two candidates. I will vot for Trump as he is a demagogue who will be a catalyst for change. If change means a massive swing back in time and to the right. Back and to the right. Back and to the right. Back and to the right.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 17:10:44 GMT
A woman's scorn is deeper and a scaring than a man's worst tirade. Unforgiving and damning to the core. Only a few women and men can forgive and forget. This is why the Clinton's and the Trumps are not in tune with a greater self witnessed in the prose of Abraham Lincoln. The industrial communication revelations have produced dust compared to those who dared to visit inward rather than outward in their pursuit of the perceived goodness and straight forward thinking of some the great Presidents and statesmen. Theses are not the the worst disasters to run for President, they are who we are today. Thin and baseless as the timed life's we live. Their are no differences in these two candidates. I will vot for Trump as he is a demagogue who will be a catalyst for change. If change means a massive swing back in time and to the right. Back and to the right. Back and to the right. Back and to the right. There you go. Might as well say the rest for you: -Republicans are racist -Republicans are sexist and homophobic -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children -Republicans want to lock up the homeless
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 4, 2016 18:19:42 GMT
If change means a massive swing back in time and to the right. Back and to the right. Back and to the right. Back and to the right. There you go. Might as well say the rest for you: -Republicans are racist -Republicans are sexist and homophobic -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children -Republicans want to lock up the homeless -Republicans are racist Yes. -Republicans are sexist and homophobic Yes. -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children Republicans want to eliminate school lunch and introduce school prayer. -Republicans want to lock up the homeless Republicans - Ronald Reagan - freed the mentally incompetent from state funded mental hospitals and allowed them to roam the streets scavenging for food. With enough education you might become one of us comrade.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 19:05:43 GMT
There you go. Might as well say the rest for you: -Republicans are racist -Republicans are sexist and homophobic -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children -Republicans want to lock up the homeless -Republicans are racist Yes. -Republicans are sexist and homophobic Yes. -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children Republicans want to eliminate school lunch and introduce school prayer. -Republicans want to lock up the homeless Republicans - Ronald Reagan - freed the mentally incompetent from state funded mental hospitals and allowed them to roam the streets scavenging for food. With enough education you might become one of us comrade. It's just amazing how many people believe "Democrat, good. Republican, bad." PM when you get the chance, I have a bridge I'm trying to sell. Priced to move.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 4, 2016 19:27:30 GMT
-Republicans are racist Yes. -Republicans are sexist and homophobic Yes. -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children Republicans want to eliminate school lunch and introduce school prayer. -Republicans want to lock up the homeless Republicans - Ronald Reagan - freed the mentally incompetent from state funded mental hospitals and allowed them to roam the streets scavenging for food. With enough education you might become one of us comrade. It's just amazing how many people believe "Democrat, good. Republican, bad." PM when you get the chance, I have a bridge I'm trying to sell. Priced to move. Yes, the world is full of problems, not enough people believe Democrats are good and Republicans are bad. Bicycle lanes on that bride? Are women and minorities banned? Was it privately funded?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 19:40:36 GMT
It's just amazing how many people believe "Democrat, good. Republican, bad." PM when you get the chance, I have a bridge I'm trying to sell. Priced to move. Yes, the world is full of problems, not enough people believe Democrats are good and Republicans are bad. Bicycle lanes on that bride? Are women and minorities banned? Was it privately funded? You sound consumed by your own prejudices based on how people vote.
|
|
|
Post by NAS on Sept 4, 2016 20:36:45 GMT
-Republicans are racist Yes. -Republicans are sexist and homophobic Yes. -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children Republicans want to eliminate school lunch and introduce school prayer. -Republicans want to lock up the homeless Republicans - Ronald Reagan - freed the mentally incompetent from state funded mental hospitals and allowed them to roam the streets scavenging for food. With enough education you might become one of us comrade. I'm a Repbulican. I'm not racist, sexist or homophobic. I'm not religious, but I remember when I was a kid, The Pledge of Allegiance ended with "amen". I don't think anyone was actually harmed by saying it. Forcing prayer in school is dumb. I'm against that. I don't want to eliminate free lunch at school for the poor kids. That's a drop in the ocean when it comes to egregious spending on the Democrat side. So sorry, BHab, but everything you hear on the news or read online isn't true.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2016 22:34:32 GMT
-Republicans are racist Yes. -Republicans are sexist and homophobic Yes. -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children Republicans want to eliminate school lunch and introduce school prayer. -Republicans want to lock up the homeless Republicans - Ronald Reagan - freed the mentally incompetent from state funded mental hospitals and allowed them to roam the streets scavenging for food. With enough education you might become one of us comrade. I'm a Repbulican. I'm not racist, sexist or homophobic. I'm not religious, but I remember when I was a kid, The Pledge of Allegiance ended with "amen". I don't think anyone was actually harmed by saying it. Forcing prayer in school is dumb. I'm against that. I don't want to eliminate free lunch at school for the poor kids. That's a drop in the ocean when it comes to egregious spending on the Democrat side. So sorry, BHab, but everything you hear on the news or read online isn't true. They just want to help people. Good intentions preclude any analysis or judgement of whether these policies actually work. Now let's get back to the serious issues like subsidizing superfoods to the children of transgendered Clinton Foundation donors.
|
|