|
Post by islamorada on Sept 5, 2016 0:40:37 GMT
There you go. Might as well say the rest for you: -Republicans are racist -Republicans are sexist and homophobic -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children -Republicans want to lock up the homeless -Republicans are racist Yes. -Republicans are sexist and homophobic Yes. -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children Republicans want to eliminate school lunch and introduce school prayer. -Republicans want to lock up the homeless Republicans - Ronald Reagan - freed the mentally incompetent from state funded mental hospitals and allowed them to roam the streets scavenging for food. With enough education you might become one of us comrade. Liberals are judgmental as Republicans. Answer the debt issue if you dare. Both parties are guilty. So how does Clinton solve the problem? Her answer is status quo. I have no doubt Trump will not build a wall. But he will rankle the bureaucracy, pseudo job making machine of the past 8 years. Bush was not better with the military intrusions. Both parties are in bed with Chinese investment. We the people simply don't run the country. To debate the two party system today is like debating who ran the government into debt more. Natural resources mad the country, a open democracy without religious intrusions made Americans independent, Corporations allowed growth, and the government/corporate marriage has doomed us as a people. Demagogues, like what San Dog used in his avatar message (Huey Long), are catalysts for change. Status quo of the Bush/Clinton Era are not.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 5, 2016 1:04:46 GMT
-Republicans are racist Yes. -Republicans are sexist and homophobic Yes. -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children Republicans want to eliminate school lunch and introduce school prayer. -Republicans want to lock up the homeless Republicans - Ronald Reagan - freed the mentally incompetent from state funded mental hospitals and allowed them to roam the streets scavenging for food. With enough education you might become one of us comrade. I'm a Repbulican. I'm not racist, sexist or homophobic. I'm not religious, but I remember when I was a kid, The Pledge of Allegiance ended with "amen". I don't think anyone was actually harmed by saying it. Forcing prayer in school is dumb. I'm against that. I don't want to eliminate free lunch at school for the poor kids. That's a drop in the ocean when it comes to egregious spending on the Democrat side. So sorry, BHab, but everything you hear on the news or read online isn't true. Henry started it, blame him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 1:35:05 GMT
I'm a Repbulican. I'm not racist, sexist or homophobic. I'm not religious, but I remember when I was a kid, The Pledge of Allegiance ended with "amen". I don't think anyone was actually harmed by saying it. Forcing prayer in school is dumb. I'm against that. I don't want to eliminate free lunch at school for the poor kids. That's a drop in the ocean when it comes to egregious spending on the Democrat side. So sorry, BHab, but everything you hear on the news or read online isn't true. Henry started it, blame him. We might as well start now and get the Bowers blaming machine warmed up for the season!
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 5, 2016 13:10:31 GMT
-Republicans are racist Yes. -Republicans are sexist and homophobic Yes. -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children Republicans want to eliminate school lunch and introduce school prayer. -Republicans want to lock up the homeless Republicans - Ronald Reagan - freed the mentally incompetent from state funded mental hospitals and allowed them to roam the streets scavenging for food. With enough education you might become one of us comrade. I'm a Repbulican. I'm not racist, sexist or homophobic. I'm not religious, but I remember when I was a kid, The Pledge of Allegiance ended with "amen". I don't think anyone was actually harmed by saying it. Forcing prayer in school is dumb. I'm against that. I don't want to eliminate free lunch at school for the poor kids. That's a drop in the ocean when it comes to egregious spending on the Democrat side. So sorry, BHab, but everything you hear on the news or read online isn't true. Oh - and while you may call yourself a Republican, that doesn't really matter. I wasn't really referring to Republican voters, but the politicians. Is Trump a racist? He's made some statements that lead me to believe he is. His actions in the past lead me to believe that he is racist, the lawsuits leveled against him for housing discrimination. And while you might be too young to remember, but David Duke was a major media figure in the 70's. And he has been in the news frequently since then. Plus previous Trump comments prove that he very well knew who David Duke was. This 'bad connection' and he 'didn't really hear' is obviously bullshit because he repeated the name himself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 14:01:37 GMT
I'm a Repbulican. I'm not racist, sexist or homophobic. I'm not religious, but I remember when I was a kid, The Pledge of Allegiance ended with "amen". I don't think anyone was actually harmed by saying it. Forcing prayer in school is dumb. I'm against that. I don't want to eliminate free lunch at school for the poor kids. That's a drop in the ocean when it comes to egregious spending on the Democrat side. So sorry, BHab, but everything you hear on the news or read online isn't true. Oh - and while you may call yourself a Republican, that doesn't really matter. I wasn't really referring to Republican voters, but the politicians. Is Trump a racist? He's made some statements that lead me to believe he is. His actions in the past lead me to believe that he is racist, the lawsuits leveled against him for housing discrimination. And while you might be too young to remember, but David Duke was a major media figure in the 70's. And he has been in the news frequently since then. Plus previous Trump comments prove that he very well knew who David Duke was. This 'bad connection' and he 'didn't really hear' is obviously bullshit because he repeated the name himself. Those lawsuits never amounted to crap, and what went on was a common practice and problem in real estate in the 1970's. Educate yourself and look up red lining. Trump was never accused of being a racist until he ran for President against a Democrat. Tying him to David Duke makes me think you aren't worth talking politics to, like a Marco or Stanley. No reasonable person thinks Donald Trump is in league or a supporter of David Duke.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 5, 2016 14:13:19 GMT
Oh - and while you may call yourself a Republican, that doesn't really matter. I wasn't really referring to Republican voters, but the politicians. Is Trump a racist? He's made some statements that lead me to believe he is. His actions in the past lead me to believe that he is racist, the lawsuits leveled against him for housing discrimination. And while you might be too young to remember, but David Duke was a major media figure in the 70's. And he has been in the news frequently since then. Plus previous Trump comments prove that he very well knew who David Duke was. This 'bad connection' and he 'didn't really hear' is obviously bullshit because he repeated the name himself. Those lawsuits never amounted to crap, and what went on was a common practice and problem in real estate in the 1970's. Educate yourself and look up red lining. Trump was never accused of being a racist until he ran for President against a Democrat. Tying him to David Duke makes me think you aren't worth talking politics to, like a Marco or Stanley. No reasonable person thinks Donald Trump is in league or a supporter of David Duke. www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/29/donald-trump-blacks-lawsuit_n_855553.html
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 5, 2016 14:16:59 GMT
Oh - and while you may call yourself a Republican, that doesn't really matter. I wasn't really referring to Republican voters, but the politicians. Is Trump a racist? He's made some statements that lead me to believe he is. His actions in the past lead me to believe that he is racist, the lawsuits leveled against him for housing discrimination. And while you might be too young to remember, but David Duke was a major media figure in the 70's. And he has been in the news frequently since then. Plus previous Trump comments prove that he very well knew who David Duke was. This 'bad connection' and he 'didn't really hear' is obviously bullshit because he repeated the name himself. Those lawsuits never amounted to crap, and what went on was a common practice and problem in real estate in the 1970's. Educate yourself and look up red lining. Trump was never accused of being a racist until he ran for President against a Democrat. Tying him to David Duke makes me think you aren't worth talking politics to, like a Marco or Stanley. No reasonable person thinks Donald Trump is in league or a supporter of David Duke. It was OK because everyone was doing it? What do you mean those lawsuits never amounted to crap, he settled, didn't he? If he didn't do it, why would he settle? No, he certainly was accused of being a racist before running for President, see the HuPo article. And it's not the issue of Trump supporting Duke, no one has said that, but Duke supporting Trump.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 14:18:31 GMT
Those lawsuits never amounted to crap, and what went on was a common practice and problem in real estate in the 1970's. Educate yourself and look up red lining. Trump was never accused of being a racist until he ran for President against a Democrat. Tying him to David Duke makes me think you aren't worth talking politics to, like a Marco or Stanley. No reasonable person thinks Donald Trump is in league or a supporter of David Duke. www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/29/donald-trump-blacks-lawsuit_n_855553.htmlI read the Washington Post's coverage of this-where they have real journalists. Ancient history and they couldn't prove any wrong doing. This "scandal" precedes Whitewater by ten years.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 5, 2016 14:29:37 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 14:32:36 GMT
WikiLeaks has shown MSNBC to be pretty trustworthy. Who was the executive producer of that segment? Debbie Wasserman Schultz?
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 5, 2016 14:36:09 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 14:39:36 GMT
You're part of the sheeple Bhab! Do you also think Sean Kuraly is going to win ROY? You make a strong case, though. A lawsuit that ended without any admission of guilt forty years ago and what the viewers of Rachel Maddox think.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 5, 2016 14:41:43 GMT
WikiLeaks has shown MSNBC to be pretty trustworthy. Who was the executive producer of that segment? Debbie Wasserman Schultz? OK, is there anything - anything - that you find negative about Trump? Do you really believe that he would be the healthiest president ever elected? Do you really believe that he would build a wall and get Mexico to pay for it? Do you really believe that he would stop crime so fast "it will make your head spin"?
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 5, 2016 14:43:47 GMT
You're part of the sheeple Bhab! Do you also think Sean Kuraly is going to win ROY? You make a strong case, though. A lawsuit that ended without any admission of guilt forty years ago and what the viewers of Rachel Maddox think. I think the left wing media is much closer to center than the right wing media.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 5, 2016 14:45:46 GMT
WikiLeaks has shown MSNBC to be pretty trustworthy. Who was the executive producer of that segment? Debbie Wasserman Schultz? OK, is there anything - anything - that you find negative about Trump? Do you really believe that he would be the healthiest president ever elected? Do you really believe that he would build a wall and get Mexico to pay for it? Do you really believe that he would stop crime so fast "it will make your head spin"? And no, I think Bruins drafting has been horrific. I don't think any of their picks will even be in the NHL this coming season other than Heinen, maybe a couple of multi game callups for the others, maybe, but none will be NHL regulars.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 14:46:15 GMT
WikiLeaks has shown MSNBC to be pretty trustworthy. Who was the executive producer of that segment? Debbie Wasserman Schultz? OK, is there anything - anything - that you find negative about Trump? Do you really believe that he would be the healthiest president ever elected? Do you really believe that he would build a wall and get Mexico to pay for it? Do you really believe that he would stop crime so fast "it will make your head spin"? I believe it's a waste of my breath to talk politics with someone that disagrees with me while having the facts wrong. You are infatuated with DNC vetted and distorted coverage aimed at low information voters.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Sept 5, 2016 14:52:22 GMT
OK, is there anything - anything - that you find negative about Trump? Do you really believe that he would be the healthiest president ever elected? Do you really believe that he would build a wall and get Mexico to pay for it? Do you really believe that he would stop crime so fast "it will make your head spin"? I believe it's a waste of my breath to talk politics with someone that disagrees with me while having the facts wrong. You are infatuated with DNC vetted and distorted coverage aimed at low information voters. I would say exactly the same about you, just replace DNC with RNC. Pat Buchanan is a Republican that I have respect for.
|
|
|
Post by bostonfan191646 on Sept 5, 2016 15:52:28 GMT
If change means a massive swing back in time and to the right. Back and to the right. Back and to the right. Back and to the right. There you go. Might as well say the rest for you: -Republicans are racist -Republicans are sexist and homophobic -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children -Republicans want to lock up the homeless See, I know that's not true, but it's kind of what the Republican Party is about these days. They push voter id legislation that's blatantly racist. They push blatantly homophobic legislation. They spend an awful lot of time bitching about the costs of social programs, but want to drive military spending up, when we have 6 more air craft carriers than we could ever use. The gop has to come to the left a bit if they want to win the White House anytime soon. 35 years ago Obama is a moderate republican, and now people are calling him a socialist
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 16:22:41 GMT
There you go. Might as well say the rest for you: -Republicans are racist -Republicans are sexist and homophobic -Republicans hate reduced school lunch because they want to starve children -Republicans want to lock up the homeless See, I know that's not true, but it's kind of what the Republican Party is about these days. They push voter id legislation that's blatantly racist. They push blatantly homophobic legislation. They spend an awful lot of time bitching about the costs of social programs, but want to drive military spending up, when we have 6 more air craft carriers than we could ever use. The gop has to come to the left a bit if they want to win the White House anytime soon. 35 years ago Obama is a moderate republican, and now people are calling him a socialist You're dead wrong about Republicans not moving left, and how in the world is requiring photo ID to vote racist? States used to require a literacy test (of questions about calculus) or a poll tax to vote, now that's true voter suppression and discrimination. This country has moved far left to where we can't even combat voter fraud without left wing race hustlers playing the race card. Now to illustrate my point, I'll turn the mic over to the alt-right Republican Bill Clinton as he delivers his 1995 SoTU: "All Americans, not only in the states most heavily affected but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers. That's why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace as recommended by the commission headed by former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan. We are a nation of immigrants. But we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it." Alt-Right Billy also declared "the end of the era of big government," balanced the budget, initiated mass incarceration that affected minorities almost exclusively, spearheaded seven military actions, and passed radical welfare reform.
|
|
|
Post by bostonfan191646 on Sept 5, 2016 16:31:23 GMT
See, I know that's not true, but it's kind of what the Republican Party is about these days. They push voter id legislation that's blatantly racist. They push blatantly homophobic legislation. They spend an awful lot of time bitching about the costs of social programs, but want to drive military spending up, when we have 6 more air craft carriers than we could ever use. The gop has to come to the left a bit if they want to win the White House anytime soon. 35 years ago Obama is a moderate republican, and now people are calling him a socialist You're dead wrong about Republicans not moving left, and how in the world is requiring photo ID to vote racist? States used to require a literacy test (of questions about calculus) or a poll tax to vote, now that's true voter suppression and discrimination. This country has moved far left to where we can't even combat voter fraud without left wing race hustlers playing the race card. Now to illustrate my point, I'll turn the mic over to the alt-right Republican Bill Clinton as he delivers his 1995 SoTU: "All Americans, not only in the states most heavily affected but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers. That's why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace as recommended by the commission headed by former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan. We are a nation of immigrants. But we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it." Alt-Right Billy also declared "the end of the era of big government," balanced the budget, initiated mass incarceration that affected minorities almost exclusively, spearheaded seven military actions, and passed radical welfare reform. My friend, it's not a secret. In PA they flat out openly said that this was a law that would decrease the number of minorities to vote, thus making a Romney victory easier. They didn't try to hide it. With the repeal of the voting rights act, Texas instantly started switching around how they set up the voting booths, so that lines in areas that are more minority filled were ten times as long. They aren't even hiding it, voter id laws have one purpose, preventing minorities voting. Cmon, you realize this. The GOP has flat out said it
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2016 17:03:52 GMT
You're dead wrong about Republicans not moving left, and how in the world is requiring photo ID to vote racist? States used to require a literacy test (of questions about calculus) or a poll tax to vote, now that's true voter suppression and discrimination. This country has moved far left to where we can't even combat voter fraud without left wing race hustlers playing the race card. Now to illustrate my point, I'll turn the mic over to the alt-right Republican Bill Clinton as he delivers his 1995 SoTU: "All Americans, not only in the states most heavily affected but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers. That's why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace as recommended by the commission headed by former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan. We are a nation of immigrants. But we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it." Alt-Right Billy also declared "the end of the era of big government," balanced the budget, initiated mass incarceration that affected minorities almost exclusively, spearheaded seven military actions, and passed radical welfare reform. My friend, it's not a secret. In PA they flat out openly said that this was a law that would decrease the number of minorities to vote, thus making a Romney victory easier. They didn't try to hide it. With the repeal of the voting rights act, Texas instantly started switching around how they set up the voting booths, so that lines in areas that are more minority filled were ten times as long. They aren't even hiding it, voter id laws have one purpose, preventing minorities voting. Cmon, you realize this. The GOP has flat out said it Where did the GOP say that? There are just as many cases on the other side, like the number of precincts (57, I believe) in Philadelphia that recorded ZERO votes for Romney in 2012. There's nothing racist about the NC voting ID law. 1. A judge said it wasn't discrimination already, meaning the law is being interpreted on an appeal vs a simple violation of civil rights. The ruling is being appealed a third time and will probably go to the Supreme Court. 2. The argument is over whether or not food stamp cards should be admissable as ID which is pretty hilarious if not sad. Everybody knows Democrats try to buy votes with welfare benefits, but I don't think a line that straight has been drawn between argument and actuality. I mean, someone in line voting for their benefits with an EBT card as their only ID? Give me a break. 3. Voters in NC can get voter IDs--for free--at the DMV.
|
|
|
Post by NAS on Sept 5, 2016 17:38:55 GMT
Those lawsuits never amounted to crap, and what went on was a common practice and problem in real estate in the 1970's. Educate yourself and look up red lining. Trump was never accused of being a racist until he ran for President against a Democrat. Tying him to David Duke makes me think you aren't worth talking politics to, like a Marco or Stanley. No reasonable person thinks Donald Trump is in league or a supporter of David Duke. It was OK because everyone was doing it? What do you mean those lawsuits never amounted to crap, he settled, didn't he? If he didn't do it, why would he settle? No, he certainly was accused of being a racist before running for President, see the HuPo article. And it's not the issue of Trump supporting Duke, no one has said that, but Duke supporting Trump. Duke supports Trump and that's a black mark on Trump?
|
|
|
Post by NAS on Sept 5, 2016 17:39:43 GMT
It was OK because everyone was doing it? What do you mean those lawsuits never amounted to crap, he settled, didn't he? If he didn't do it, why would he settle? No, he certainly was accused of being a racist before running for President, see the HuPo article. And it's not the issue of Trump supporting Duke, no one has said that, but Duke supporting Trump. Duke supports Trump and that's a black mark on Trump? Wait. As a GOP supporter, "black mark" is probably racist. A pink mark.
|
|
|
Post by NAS on Sept 5, 2016 17:40:14 GMT
Duke supports Trump and that's a black mark on Trump? Wait. As a GOP supporter, "black mark" is probably racist. A pink mark. Wait. That's probably homophobic. A white mark. There.
|
|
|
Post by walktheline on Sept 5, 2016 18:51:30 GMT
Wait. As a GOP supporter, "black mark" is probably racist. A pink mark. Wait. That's probably homophobic. A white mark. There. No, that's a bit supremacist-ish. Maybe a red mark? No, that's bad, too. Frickin' injuns...um, Native Americans will get pissed. Go with yellow. Oh, wait. Not to be too PC here but the orientals, or whatever they call themselves these days, will take offense. How about you just use some bright color from the rainbow that has nothing to do with anyone's skin color? Oh, hold on...the LGBTQRSTUV crowd have taken all those now. Man, you just better go with a "negative mark" and keep color out of it altogether. Oh, shit...I bet there are some ions who'll get charged up over that.
|
|