Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2015 21:05:01 GMT
David Krejci, Malcolm Subban and Chris Kelly to Edmonton Taylor Hall, Ben Scrivens, Rob Klinkhammer Kel.............. channeling his inner Shupe and comes up with a blockbuster. |
|
|
|
Post by UtahGetMeTwo on Jun 4, 2015 0:13:39 GMT
Yes Kassian is back.
Gosh I missed him!
|
|
|
|
Post by 50belowzero on Jun 4, 2015 1:05:34 GMT
We'll try to get Kassian involved in as many trades as we can! Can never have enough. He's a sure fire 30 gl man,just has to change locales,Nucks are misusing him.
|
|
|
|
Post by bostonfan191646 on Jun 4, 2015 4:04:22 GMT
I have a number of friends that are Rangers fans. Almost all of them think girardi is the odd man out. I don't get it, but it's what they want. 2016 1st and morrow?
|
|
|
|
Post by 50belowzero on Jun 4, 2015 5:46:27 GMT
I have a number of friends that are Rangers fans. Almost all of them think girardi is the odd man out. I don't get it, but it's what they want. 2016 1st and morrow? If the Rags like Yandle more, then someones got to go,they already have Staal and McDonagh who play the same type of game,so Girardi makes sense,him or Staal. |
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Jun 4, 2015 11:29:34 GMT
I have a number of friends that are Rangers fans. Almost all of them think girardi is the odd man out. I don't get it, but it's what they want. 2016 1st and morrow? I'd be really leery of something like that - they need to figure out what their strategy is and whether or not the perception that they're just a few bounces and better health away from being a title contender again is reality. Otherwise, Morrow might be a much better long term bet than $5M+ Girardi and that 2016 pick could be a good one.
Be great to add Girardi if they had the cap space to do it.
|
|
|
|
Post by UtahGetMeTwo on Jun 4, 2015 12:29:26 GMT
Girardi got burned left n right in the playoffs especially against Tampa.
If DS gives up a 1st and Morrow, I would want a lot more than a stiff like Girardi.
|
|
|
|
Post by walktheline on Jun 4, 2015 13:53:53 GMT
If they're going to give up a 1st and Morrow I would rather have Seabrook.
|
|
|
|
Post by bostonfan191646 on Jun 4, 2015 15:47:07 GMT
I have a number of friends that are Rangers fans. Almost all of them think girardi is the odd man out. I don't get it, but it's what they want. 2016 1st and morrow? I'd be really leery of something like that - they need to figure out what their strategy is and whether or not the perception that they're just a few bounces and better health away from being a title contender again is reality. Otherwise, Morrow might be a much better long term bet than $5M+ Girardi and that 2016 pick could be a good one.
Be great to add Girardi if they had the cap space to do it.
Perhaps a first and a lesser prospect then. I was more thinking along the lines of the money. Girardi is a really good player, and he's got cost certainty at 5.5. Given that Petry just got the same deal, I would jump at that |
|
|
|
Post by bostonfan191646 on Jun 4, 2015 15:47:30 GMT
If they're going to give up a 1st and Morrow I would rather have Seabrook. For a year? |
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Jun 4, 2015 16:33:13 GMT
I'd be really leery of something like that - they need to figure out what their strategy is and whether or not the perception that they're just a few bounces and better health away from being a title contender again is reality. Otherwise, Morrow might be a much better long term bet than $5M+ Girardi and that 2016 pick could be a good one.
Be great to add Girardi if they had the cap space to do it.
Perhaps a first and a lesser prospect then. I was more thinking along the lines of the money. Girardi is a really good player, and he's got cost certainty at 5.5. Given that Petry just got the same deal, I would jump at that Trick is, I don't know that that gets it done. I think a move like this is something you do thinking you want to move Seidenberg. You add a million to your cap for a younger player, an upgrade (thought I'd have to think about that), and you're paying a lot more to get him than you'll get moving out DS. No question the money is good. |
|
|
|
Post by bostonfan191646 on Jun 4, 2015 16:53:35 GMT
I don't think you'd have to move seids to make it work. First pairing chara and girardi, second pairing seids and hamilton, third pairing krug and trotman. Miller 7th d has a cap hit of 21.2 plus whatever Douglas gets. That's not too bad. Call it 25.8, leaves about 38 million for the forwards
|
|
|
|
Post by walktheline on Jun 4, 2015 17:18:30 GMT
If they're going to give up a 1st and Morrow I would rather have Seabrook. For a year? Ah, good catch. I thought he had 2 years left on his deal. Then no, I would not fork over a 1st and Morrow for him. Morrow and a 3rd. |
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Jun 4, 2015 18:27:57 GMT
I don't think you'd have to move seids to make it work. First pairing chara and girardi, second pairing seids and hamilton, third pairing krug and trotman. Miller 7th d has a cap hit of 21.2 plus whatever Douglas gets. That's not too bad. Call it 25.8, leaves about 38 million for the forwards Just so no one else thinks you missed this - that's also after you take Rask out of the equation. Krejci, Bergeron, Lucic, Marchand and Ericksson add up to about $29 of that $38M. Connolly, Spooner and Pastrnak will help, you hope, because even with RFA status for two of those guys, you're looking at maybe $5 for the lot, which leaves you $4M for Talbot and two kids and a back up - a mil or less per. Yeah, I guess that could work. Hm.... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2015 22:32:55 GMT
I'd be really leery of something like that - they need to figure out what their strategy is and whether or not the perception that they're just a few bounces and better health away from being a title contender again is reality. Otherwise, Morrow might be a much better long term bet than $5M+ Girardi and that 2016 pick could be a good one.
Be great to add Girardi if they had the cap space to do it.
Perhaps a first and a lesser prospect then. I was more thinking along the lines of the money. Girardi is a really good player, and he's got cost certainty at 5.5. Given that Petry just got the same deal, I would jump at that Girardi is an excellent player .............one of the best shot blockers in the league. Love the way he plays. |
|
|
|
Post by goodnewsbears on Jun 4, 2015 23:10:33 GMT
I don't think you'd have to move seids to make it work. First pairing chara and girardi, second pairing seids and hamilton, third pairing krug and trotman. Miller 7th d has a cap hit of 21.2 plus whatever Douglas gets. That's not too bad. Call it 25.8, leaves about 38 million for the forwards Just so no one else thinks you missed this - that's also after you take Rask out of the equation. Krejci, Bergeron, Lucic, Marchand and Ericksson add up to about $29 of that $38M. Connolly, Spooner and Pastrnak will help, you hope, because even with RFA status for two of those guys, you're looking at maybe $5 for the lot, which leaves you $4M for Talbot and two kids and a back up - a mil or less per. Yeah, I guess that could work. Hm.... So why is everybody saying the B's are in cap hell? That doesn't sound too bad. |
|
|
|
Post by bostonfan191646 on Jun 5, 2015 18:57:03 GMT
Yes, thank you book, I forgot to mention I took out 8 million for goaltending. Personally, given that you have three players on the roster with high offensive ceilings in Connolly, spooner, and pasta, I would spend the money on d, and I think for the money, girardi is an excellent fit. I also think the Rangers will trade either Staal or girardi in the near future.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2015 0:57:13 GMT
ANA- Tuukka Rask
BOS-Maroon, Vatanen/Lindholm, Andersen
ANA gets a "final piece." Boston get a big body like Horton to put with Lucic and Krejci, and another PMD to balance a top-4 of Chara, Vatanen, Seidenberg, Hamilton and keep Millar and Krug off the top-4. Andersen benefits from a good defense and the cap dollars work for both sides.
|
|
|
|
Post by dezaruchi on Jun 6, 2015 1:21:00 GMT
ANA- Tuukka Rask BOS-Maroon, Vatanen/Lindholm, Andersen ANA gets a "final piece." Boston get a big body like Horton to put with Lucic and Krejci, and another PMD to balance a top-4 of Chara, Vatanen, Seidenberg, Hamilton and keep Millar and Krug off the top-4. Andersen benefits from a good defense and the cap dollars work for both sides. Actually seems like a decent proposal. Nice work Henry. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2015 1:41:51 GMT
NSH-Kelly
BOS-Gaustad
The cupboard is bare down in Providence. I was looking for prospects to trade and the highest scorer has something like 40 points. They might be better off dumping some guys like Kelly and Millar for prospects. If it goes sideways this year, I think that's what they'll be doing next summer.
|
|
|
|
Post by dezaruchi on Jun 6, 2015 1:54:38 GMT
NSH-Kelly BOS-Gaustad The cupboard is bare down in Providence. I was looking for prospects to trade and the highest scorer has something like 40 points. They might be better off dumping some guys like Kelly and Millar for prospects. If it goes sideways this year, I think that's what they'll be doing next summer. I think Sweeney will be happy to get any pick higher than a 5th for Kelley. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2015 12:52:09 GMT
My thinking is that with Kelly and Campbell gone, Gaustad and Spooner can center the fourth and third lines, and have more of a three line attack.
|
|
|
|
Post by UtahGetMeTwo on Jun 6, 2015 13:01:59 GMT
ANA- Tuukka Rask BOS-Maroon, Vatanen/Lindholm, Andersen ANA gets a "final piece." Boston get a big body like Horton to put with Lucic and Krejci, and another PMD to balance a top-4 of Chara, Vatanen, Seidenberg, Hamilton and keep Millar and Krug off the top-4. Andersen benefits from a good defense and the cap dollars work for both sides. DS would probably have to throw in Trotman and/or KoKo. I would do that trade. |
|
|
|
Post by 50belowzero on Jun 6, 2015 13:55:35 GMT
ANA- Tuukka Rask BOS-Maroon, Vatanen/Lindholm, Andersen ANA gets a "final piece." Boston get a big body like Horton to put with Lucic and Krejci, and another PMD to balance a top-4 of Chara, Vatanen, Seidenberg, Hamilton and keep Millar and Krug off the top-4. Andersen benefits from a good defense and the cap dollars work for both sides. Actually seems like a decent proposal. Nice work Henry. It looks like a good trade to me as well,Maroon is a LW though,so playing with Fat & Krejci won't work. Maroon,Spooner,Pasta i guess,or keep Fat with this line and put Maroon with Krejci & Connolly. |
|
|
|
Post by crowls on Jun 6, 2015 13:55:36 GMT
My thinking is that with Kelly and Campbell gone, Gaustad and Spooner can center the fourth and third lines, and have more of a three line attack. Can't believe I am typing this, but I would rather just keep Kelly.
No Cap relief in that deal, Gaustad's hit is +$250k over Kelly. Frankly, think Kelly is a better player than Gaustad and probably a better fit.
|
|
