|
Post by 50belowzero on Jan 1, 2024 0:01:28 GMT
I disagree with the Geekie comment...B's will be fine in 3rd. What was Geekie's comment?
|
|
|
Post by #4 Bobby Orr! GOAT! on Jan 1, 2024 0:02:08 GMT
69.1 in the rulebook: This rule is based on the premise that an attacking player’s position, whether inside or outside the crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances be allowed. Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal; or (2) an attacking player initiates intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of his goal crease. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact. The rule will be enforced exclusively in accordance with the on-ice judgement of the Referee(s), but may be subject to a Coach’s Challenge Sways right skate was still in the blue
|
|
|
Post by nitelite on Jan 1, 2024 0:02:14 GMT
I'll say this...if that was a B...no goal. STOP IT!! GEEZUS GROW THE FUCK UP!
|
|
|
Post by socca10 on Jan 1, 2024 0:03:46 GMT
That was an all out effort to interfere with the catching glove and zero effort to avoid contact. I agree but obviously the refs thought the Wings player made a "reasonable effort". It is what it is, bad calls every game , every night, nothing changes. That's not what they said, and it wasn't the referees who ultimately blew that call, it was the fellas in TO. Either way, they blew it... you shouldn't take 5 minutes with the so-called "unbiased experts" and still get the call wrong, that's not a ref missing a call in the flow of the game.
|
|
|
Post by nitelite on Jan 1, 2024 0:04:32 GMT
The GOALIE UNION SHOULD BE FURIOUS ABOUT THAT 2ND GOAL BEING ALLOWED! PLEASE DON'T PUT A CONSPIRACY THEORY TO THIS LIKE DANNY! ITS A BAD CALL WHICH EVERY TEAM IN THE LEAGUE GETS!
|
|
|
Post by 50belowzero on Jan 1, 2024 0:05:30 GMT
I agree but obviously the refs thought the Wings player made a "reasonable effort". It is what it is, bad calls every game , every night, nothing changes. That's not what they said, and it wasn't the referees who ultimately blew that call, it was the fellas in TO. Either way, they blew it... you shouldn't take 5 minutes with the so-called "unbiased experts" and still get the call wrong, that's not a ref missing a call in the flow of the game. I was under the impression that the final call was left to the refs but whatever, bad call, move on. McCauley when he announced the review seemed drunk.
|
|
|
Post by nitelite on Jan 1, 2024 0:08:55 GMT
That's not what they said, and it wasn't the referees who ultimately blew that call, it was the fellas in TO. Either way, they blew it... you shouldn't take 5 minutes with the so-called "unbiased experts" and still get the call wrong, that's not a ref missing a call in the flow of the game. I was under the impression that the final call was left to the refs but whatever, bad call, move on. McCauley when he announced the review seemed drunk. 🙄🙄🙄 OH COMON 50!
|
|
|
Post by islamorada on Jan 1, 2024 0:08:57 GMT
That's not what they said, and it wasn't the referees who ultimately blew that call, it was the fellas in TO. Either way, they blew it... you shouldn't take 5 minutes with the so-called "unbiased experts" and still get the call wrong, that's not a ref missing a call in the flow of the game. I was under the impression that the final call was left to the refs but whatever, bad call, move on. McCauley when he announced the review seemed drunk. As Jaffe and Pederson stated, if the intent was considered then no goal. Time to place the stick in the blue!
|
|
|
Post by zamboni24 on Jan 1, 2024 0:12:09 GMT
Wings not flustered at all. B's need to come out like they did in period 1.
Message -- Don't dare leave the blue paint and try to win a couple of faceoffs.
|
|
|
Post by 50belowzero on Jan 1, 2024 0:12:12 GMT
I was under the impression that the final call was left to the refs but whatever, bad call, move on. McCauley when he announced the review seemed drunk. 🙄🙄🙄 OH COMON 50! Ok then, it was Charron that doesn't like the B's!!
|
|
|
Post by #4 Bobby Orr! GOAT! on Jan 1, 2024 0:12:37 GMT
24% at the dot through 2.
27% yesterday
|
|
|
Post by 50belowzero on Jan 1, 2024 0:12:53 GMT
C'mon B's, win the 3rd and win the game!!
|
|
|
Post by socca10 on Jan 1, 2024 0:13:22 GMT
Ok then, it was Charron that doesn't like the B's!! Yeah, went back and looked, and all the questionable/bad calls have been Charron, not McCauley. Frankly, the NHL should let McCauley solo any game he does just for the entertainment value.
|
|
|
Post by islamorada on Jan 1, 2024 0:14:00 GMT
They are losing puck battles. Yesterday’s game and travel are influencing the execution.
|
|
|
Post by jmwalters on Jan 1, 2024 0:15:35 GMT
Coyle!
|
|
|
Post by dannycater on Jan 1, 2024 0:16:00 GMT
great pass by 73, great finish by 13
|
|
|
Post by socca10 on Jan 1, 2024 0:16:34 GMT
Well, good things happen when you actually win a faceoff! Nice play!
|
|
|
Post by jmwalters on Jan 1, 2024 0:18:54 GMT
Looks like Coyle is doing the olde Bergeron bumper spot.
|
|
|
Post by zamboni24 on Jan 1, 2024 0:21:05 GMT
Well, good things happen when you actually win a faceoff! Nice play! Exactly -- and I'm very happy -- but for goodness sake -- JACK -- a little humility please. That wasn't the OT winner.
|
|
|
Post by dannycater on Jan 1, 2024 0:21:59 GMT
Looks like Coyle is doing the olde Bergeron bumper spot. No one thought 13 would step up this year the way he has.
|
|
|
Post by jmwalters on Jan 1, 2024 0:27:33 GMT
Looks like Coyle is doing the olde Bergeron bumper spot. No one thought 13 would step up this year the way he has. He just needs to work on his FO’s
|
|
|
Post by zamboni24 on Jan 1, 2024 0:30:40 GMT
9 left -- Looks like Sway gonna have to be the man as usual.
|
|
|
Post by jmwalters on Jan 1, 2024 0:32:45 GMT
PK again
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Jan 1, 2024 0:34:33 GMT
63 can breathe on someone..penalty! But he can get x-checked, slashed and he can be knocked over and..no call!..his next slew play will be 20 game suspension..even if opponent has no chance of injury The Captain also made the most obvious dive on a flyby forecheck. He makes his own bed.
|
|
|
Post by dannycater on Jan 1, 2024 0:41:06 GMT
DeBrusk has been the reason why B's win 3 in a row...sorry, he is
|
|