|
Post by neelycam on Aug 4, 2016 16:10:02 GMT
His own party is now scrambling to figure out what to do .Lot of republicans deciding they better not back him in order to save face.Even talk that there's a chance he backs out of race.Lol unraveling fast
|
|
|
Post by islamorada on Aug 4, 2016 16:31:51 GMT
You put your support next to that moron. And it is awesome! The US economy always does better with a Democrat in the White House since Eisenhower. You are to stupid to realize it. Poor Hank B still pawing his way through a wet bag. The US economy always does better with a Democrat in office since Eisenhower. It should be Truman. The Democrats started the enlargement in government by creating bureaucrats. Jobs in the public sector. Republicans followed suit. Bureaucracy,wars and political malaise since Truman. Still no one wants to speak of the debt in those years. China owns the US dollar. Great politics!!?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 17:16:22 GMT
Only THE BadHab can clean up this stalemate thread and fix this mess of a website. Henry, why are you supporting the MONTREAL Canadiens who clearly are not an American team? Because Therrien and Bergevin are racists and so am I as a Republican.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 17:18:07 GMT
You put your support next to that moron. And it is awesome! The US economy always does better with a Democrat in the White House since Eisenhower. You are to stupid to realize it. Poor Hank B still pawing his way through a wet bag. The US economy always does better with a Democrat in office since Eisenhower. It should be Truman. The Democrats started the enlargement in government by creating bureaucrats. Jobs in the public sector. Republicans followed suit. Bureaucracy,wars and political malaise since Truman. Still no one wants to speak of the debt in those years. China owns the US dollar. Great politics!!? It's pretty easy to cook the jobs number when they're paid for by taxes and the creation of government. Obama is the only President not to record a quarterly GDP growth of 3% in American history. So much for that theory.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Aug 4, 2016 18:48:09 GMT
Only THE BadHab can clean up this stalemate thread and fix this mess of a website. Henry, why are you supporting the MONTREAL Canadiens who clearly are not an American team? Because Therrien and Bergevin are racists and so am I as a Republican.
|
|
|
Post by Fletcher on Aug 4, 2016 18:48:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Aug 4, 2016 18:50:56 GMT
Only THE BadHab can clean up this stalemate thread and fix this mess of a website. Henry, why are you supporting the MONTREAL Canadiens who clearly are not an American team? Because Therrien and Bergevin are racists and so am I as a Republican.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Aug 4, 2016 19:04:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by NAS on Aug 4, 2016 19:33:50 GMT
A lot of this anti-trump rhetoric is very Rustyl-like. He used to tell people that everyone was laughing at them and how stupid people thought they were.
With no backing, the liberals are claiming victory, yap yap yapping all day about how everyone hates Trump. It may be a terribly rude awakening for them, similar to the one the supporters of other Dem got.
#feelthatburnhillary
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 20:28:17 GMT
A lot of this anti-trump rhetoric is very Rustyl-like. He used to tell people that everyone was laughing at them and how stupid people thought they were. With no backing, the liberals are claiming victory, yap yap yapping all day about how everyone hates Trump. It may be a terribly rude awakening for them, similar to the one the supporters of other Dem got. #feelthatburnhillary Do you remember when polling data decided elections in June? A lot of this is geographic. We live in Florida which isn't as homogenous as California or Massachusetts.
|
|
|
Post by NAS on Aug 4, 2016 20:33:11 GMT
It's so dumb. Each of these candidates is one Howard Dean howl from a dead campaign. Despite what the Dems are declaring as fact, there is still a lot of time left before anything is decided.
|
|
|
Post by bookboy007 on Aug 4, 2016 21:19:43 GMT
You may get your wish. Wikileaks has said they are not done yet. It's never, ever, ever over with the Clintons. According to the New York Times, she's 78% likely to win. I'd say it's over. What do you say Vince Carter? It's over? Ok. Thanks, Vince.
|
|
|
Post by walktheline on Aug 4, 2016 21:51:42 GMT
It's never, ever, ever over with the Clintons. According to the New York Times, she's 78% likely to win. I'd say it's over. What do you say Vince Carter? It's over? Ok. Thanks, Vince. The old Gray Lady would say that about the old gray hag even if she was down 10 in the polls.
Normally I'd call this election a done deal but I think this freak show may still have some twists and turns.
|
|
|
Post by Fletcher on Aug 4, 2016 21:55:43 GMT
It's so dumb. Each of these candidates is one Howard Dean howl from a dead campaign. Despite what the Dems are declaring as fact, there is still a lot of time left before anything is decided. I think the difference is that all voters seem increasingly down on Trump, even conservative ones. I think the Republicans are about ready to throw him out, and independent and moderate voters are basically unreachable for him. He's not much of a traditional conservative to begin with, and he seems infinitely more interested in Trump than anything else. While Obama and Hillary feed him a steady stream of red meat embarrassments and scandals to jump all over, he keeps fumbling the ball instead of getting on point. He almost ignores Hillary and the fringe voters he needs, to instead try to fight every Tom, Dick and Harry that has criticized him publicly. Fighting with the parents of a dead soldier is about the stupidest thing I've ever seen (even if you see no moral or logical objection there at all) -- it just serves no purpose. His support base can't really grow, and he actually seems to be losing some of the people who have been willing to forgive so many things to support him. It's bizarre, and he seems more erratic and unprepared every time I see him. If you think that's a partisan reaction, it really isn't. I am neither a Democrat nor a Hillary supporter, and I have tried to be open-minded to the unconventional candidates. It isn't so much Trump's politics that turn me off, compared to the picture of an apparent egomaniac who seems to increasingly lack basic judgment, dignity, or the mental sanity to make the right move. When everyone is ready to hammer Hillary and Obama for their vast dirty laundry, Trump forces the conversation back to himself instead, in the most unappealing ways. It really does have an element of self-sabotage. I think the election will be a landslide, and that isn't because people like Hillary Clinton at all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 4, 2016 22:16:08 GMT
It's never, ever, ever over with the Clintons. According to the New York Times, she's 78% likely to win. I'd say it's over. What do you say Vince Carter? It's over? Ok. Thanks, Vince. Trump was 60 percent likely to win last week according to Oracle of All Liberals, Nate Silver. He also predicted Trump would lost eight primaries in a row. Hillary, Kaine (is it Khan? Kzhihr? Who's her running mate?) and Warren Buffet had 50 people in a high school gymnasium, in Buffet's hometown a few days ago when Trump had a sold out rally of 16k. The moral? It's not over until it's over, and I'm deeply distrustful of all polls and media atm. Why, they're saying Obama has a 55 percent approval rating when 70% of the country thinks we're headed in the wrong direction. How does that work?
|
|
|
Post by UtahGetMeTwo on Aug 5, 2016 0:46:46 GMT
I think it's time for more congressional email and Bengahzi hearings! You may get your wish. Wikileaks has said they are not done yet. Wouldn't shock me if Trey Gowdy and Jason Chaffetz did something quick to slow her down. he US economy always does better with a Democrat in the White House since Eisenhower. You are to stupid to realize it. Poor Hank B still pawing his way through a wet bag. The US economy always does better with a Democrat in office since Eisenhower. It should be Truman. The Democrats started the enlargement in government by creating bureaucrats. Jobs in the public sector. Republicans followed suit. Bureaucracy,wars and political malaise since Truman. Still no one wants to speak of the debt in those years. Eisenhower was the last true fiscally conservative Republican. All the rest have spent like crazy and added to the debt.
|
|
|
Post by UtahGetMeTwo on Aug 5, 2016 0:56:43 GMT
He won't get in there is a lot of Americans that have some smarts .Not all Americans dress in clown suits 18 point swing in 45 days. With no backing, the liberals are claiming victory, yap yap yapping all day about how everyone hates Trump. It may be a terribly rude awakening for them, similar to the one the supporters of other Dem got. #feelthatburnhillary Do you remember when polling data decided elections in June? You should not have mentioned polling data in June then.
|
|
|
Post by islamorada on Aug 5, 2016 1:22:06 GMT
The bureaucracy now is not connected to political parities. It has grown to such proportions that the two parties cannot deal with it's size. Congress cannot control the 4th branch of government. To wit: More than half the US population receives money from the government. Who dispenses the money is the bureaucracy? Recent monthly figures indicate private sector jobs are on the rise while public sector jobs by percentage are decreasing. This trend needs to continue for decades. Meanwhile the national debt now exceeds the annual GDP. This has never happened. The country with vast natural resources cannot simply spend money. Both parties are guilty of the coverup.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2016 1:25:20 GMT
18 point swing in 45 days. Do you remember when polling data decided elections in June? You should not have mentioned polling data in June then. Makes no sense. He was losing in June by ten. What are you talking about? You remind me of my uncle. Total moon bat. His name is Alex(jandro)and he was on college radio with the name "Liber-Al." We had to put my grandmother in the nursing home and the state put her up and put a lien on her house. My uncle's response was "isn't socialism great?"
|
|
|
Post by UtahGetMeTwo on Aug 5, 2016 1:37:58 GMT
Happy Birthday Mr. President!
|
|
|
Post by UtahGetMeTwo on Aug 5, 2016 1:39:24 GMT
You should not have mentioned polling data in June then. Makes no sense. He was losing in June by ten. What are you talking about? You are clueless when you try to spin and a huge hypocrite.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2016 2:52:52 GMT
Happy Birthday Mr. President! THIS is what he's been doing?!?!?!? I like Obama 10x more now than when he took office. In the beginning, he had the zeal of a convert and the smugness, of well, a liberal. Now he's still got a great presence in speeches but he's been brought down to Earth. Well, there's one good thing about this thread...nobody has to wait until the new season to bash Henry Bowers.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Aug 5, 2016 3:31:46 GMT
It's so dumb. Each of these candidates is one Howard Dean howl from a dead campaign. Despite what the Dems are declaring as fact, there is still a lot of time left before anything is decided. I thought you were going out of town. Get gone already will you.
|
|
|
Post by badhabitude on Aug 5, 2016 3:37:31 GMT
Happy Birthday Mr. President! THIS is what he's been doing?!?!?!? I like Obama 10x more now than when he took office. In the beginning, he had the zeal of a convert and the smugness, of well, a liberal. Now he's still got a great presence in speeches but he's been brought down to Earth. Well, there's one good thing about this thread...nobody has to wait until the new season to bash Henry Bowers. I thought this was cool(er)
|
|
|
Post by RichHillOntario on Aug 5, 2016 7:11:37 GMT
If he goes on to lose the election, do you think this will be the main reason should he continue to perform as he has in this regard? He hasn't been very forthcoming with specifics in this area. He's not doing his homework. Every President has strengths and weaknesses, but he's not doing the work outside of the spotlight to look competent on these issues. Which isn't hard, no contender talks at length about policy details. Supposedly he spends most of his downtime watching the coverage of himself. If he loses it's because of inexperience. He's in so many arguments at once it's really crazy, and the ones against the Khan's, Paul Ryan, and John McCain can only hurt him. The Press roasts Republicans at the spit and he keep coming back for seconds. Shouldn't he get rolling on it because Clinton's got decades of a head start on him in that department. That won't be a good look come the debates. Seems like he's wasting precious time on these side bouts instead of setting his sights solely on his opponent. He's an active participant in his own ass-whupping.
|
|